Take a look at the interior of the 2020 Supra

How many stars would you give Toyota on the interior? (1 being lowest & 5 being highest.)


  • Total voters
    122

Supra21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
254
Reaction score
716
Location
Coral Springs, Florida
Car(s)
2013 Mercedes Benz C250
Ignore colour and the ft1 and new “supra” are nothing alike. The red is simply an illusion.

Now compare the 3 series with the new supra and lo and behold they are virtually the same

84AE0260-7A4E-4979-BFCA-8A16FD2D58D3.jpeg


970C1715-CF3E-493B-8CBB-FAC6B2A24A54.jpeg
If that's the argument basis of comparison, make the FT-1 completely black inside and compare it then. Look at the structural placement of the cross arm on the BMW. Opposed to the FT-1 and MKV, the BMW's is on the passenger side. The only structural difference in this aspect of the design is the fact that this solid arm extends higher in the FT-1 in comparison to that which is seen in the MKV. Obviously, the sole purpose behind this is practicality.
In any case, we all see what we want to see. Simply stating actual arguments based on resemblance rather than a straight copy and paste of design will simply fly over one's head if you refuse to look for it and continue to look for reasons to hate it.
And yet still, in regards to the driver centric layout...the only Supra cockpit that's was 100% driver focused was that which was found in the MKIV...sure, the MK3 attempted this; however, its orientation was still flat.
Sponsored

 

Therealist

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
97
Reaction score
55
Location
UK
Car(s)
1996 Toyota Supra
If that's the argument basis of comparison, make the FT-1 completely black inside and compare it then. Look at the structural placement of the cross arm on the BMW. Opposed to the FT-1 and MKV, the BMW's is on the passenger side. The only structural difference in this aspect of the design is the fact that this solid arm extends higher in the FT-1 in comparison to that which is seen in the MKV. Obviously, the sole purpose behind this is practicality.
In any case, we all see what we want to see. Simply stating actual arguments based on resemblance rather than a straight copy and paste of design will simply fly over one's head if you refuse to look for it and continue to look for reasons to hate it.
And yet still, in regards to the driver centric layout...the only Supra cockpit that's was 100% driver focused was that which was found in the MKIV...sure, the MK3 attempted this; however, its orientation was still flat.
Fair comment but if you put the steering wheel on the other side then it would be the same. Mirroring the interior really is more than resemblance.

The interior on the MK3 being flat is also a fair comment but it really is a great looking one

908DE22A-5D2E-4BD6-950C-98DE8B563BEB.jpeg


1D33B586-6BC0-4943-A7C6-2AB5B4A36218.jpeg
 

DesmoSD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
1,968
Location
San Diego
Car(s)
1993.5 Supra TT, 997.1 911 Carrera S, 1199 Panigale S
Totally agree, it’s so obvious I can’t believe some few can’t see it. Even the X5 is virtually the same.

What’s hilarious is the camry has a better interior than any of these BMWs
It was those little details that Toyota used to possess, sadly not the case any more. The MKIV had the signature "turbo blade" vent that was conveniently the same size to also hold a 60mm boost gauge. SMH Toyota...

34287.jpg

20130216_190455.jpg
 

justbake

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
2,402
Location
Indy
Car(s)
F10 535i
It was those little details that Toyota used to possess, sadly not the case any more. The MKIV had the signature "turbo blade" vent that was conveniently the same size to also hold a 60mm boost gauge. SMH Toyota...
Do people still use these?

I had a digital multi-gauge like this on my 335i and it was far superior than the triple gauge pod I had on my MK3. But maybe Im just getting old and my eyes can't adjust to 3 differently spaced objects and the road like they used to
attachment.jpg
 

DesmoSD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
1,968
Location
San Diego
Car(s)
1993.5 Supra TT, 997.1 911 Carrera S, 1199 Panigale S
Do people still use these?

I had a digital multi-gauge like this on my 335i and it was far superior than the triple gauge pod I had on my MK3
attachment.jpg
Depends on their build; BPU or standalone.

attachment.jpg
 

Bryster

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Threads
70
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
1,695
Location
Los Angeles
Car(s)
Nothing,considering a Civic DX
If that's the argument basis of comparison, make the FT-1 completely black inside and compare it then. Look at the structural placement of the cross arm on the BMW. Opposed to the FT-1 and MKV, the BMW's is on the passenger side. The only structural difference in this aspect of the design is the fact that this solid arm extends higher in the FT-1 in comparison to that which is seen in the MKV. Obviously, the sole purpose behind this is practicality.
In any case, we all see what we want to see. Simply stating actual arguments based on resemblance rather than a straight copy and paste of design will simply fly over one's head if you refuse to look for it and continue to look for reasons to hate it.
And yet still, in regards to the driver centric layout...the only Supra cockpit that's was 100% driver focused was that which was found in the MKIV...sure, the MK3 attempted this; however, its orientation was still flat.
Just stop, their opinions are one and the same
 

MA617M

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2017
Threads
23
Messages
2,302
Reaction score
5,150
Location
Australia
Car(s)
lots
That corvette interior, while it is driver focused (like any 70s-90s BMW) looks cheap and tacky. The overall design is shit.

Dont forget. BMW had driver focused cockpits long before the A80 had them. Google any 70s-80s-90s 3er, 5er, 6er.
 
OP
OP
Supra93

Supra93

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Threads
82
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
4,349
Location
TX
Car(s)
Supra & RX7
https://www.topgear.com/car-news/geneva-motor-show/revealed-future-new-toyota-supra

A new cabin design?
A point he raised, not me. The Supra’s interior, as we all know, bears a very striking resemblance to the Z4’s. The architecture is identical, and the cars are built together on the same Steyr line, in Graz, Austria. In a passing comment, Tada-san said, “most sports car fans and customers would want evolution of the interior specification… so that’s what we have in mind in terms of the evolution in the future”.

This is interesting. There’s obviously a realisation that lifting so much from BMW is potentially damaging as it separates the Supra from the rest of the Toyota range, especially the GT86 (which Tada-san talks of as an ongoing project). Quite what Toyota can do to disguise the BMW origins – and indeed whether it would want to, given the difference in perceived quality between the two marques – remains to be seen.
 

justbake

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
2,402
Location
Indy
Car(s)
F10 535i
More vague responses but his remarks about the interior are rather interesting. It is common for cars to introduce different exterior parts (bumpers, lights, etc) and engine options/trims as the model develops in its lifecycle, but very few models update their interiors above minor revisions and trim upgrades. If they want to update the interior, why wait until years after launch to do so when they already had the freedom to design the interior as they pleased?
 

twntrbo03'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
249
Reaction score
573
Location
Alaska and Florida
Car(s)
1998 Supra Turbo Quicksilver ---1993 Supra Turbo Anthracite --- 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser 4x4
More vague responses but his remarks about the interior are rather interesting. It is common for cars to introduce different exterior parts (bumpers, lights, etc) and engine options/trims as the model develops in its lifecycle, but very few models update their interiors above minor revisions and trim upgrades. If they want to update the interior, why wait until years after launch to do so when they already had the freedom to design the interior as they pleased?
That was what caught my attention as well. Hopefully we can see a complete redesign of the interior in future models
 

Modal170

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
1,061
Reaction score
1,714
Location
NJ
Car(s)
86
Next thing you know, they're going to trickle down the LCF's interior into the Supra
 

twntrbo03'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
249
Reaction score
573
Location
Alaska and Florida
Car(s)
1998 Supra Turbo Quicksilver ---1993 Supra Turbo Anthracite --- 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser 4x4
Next thing you know, they're going to trickle down the LCF's interior into the Supra
Wouldn't be a bad idea TBH. They spent a ton on R&D for the LFA... would make logical sense for them to trickle down tech/designs to other Lexus and Toyota models
Sponsored

 
 




Top