Analysis, Comments & Reactions from the Web about the new Supra

AsupramkvC

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gerich
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
373
Reaction score
384
Location
Philippines, USA, Japan
Car(s)
86
Even when journalists or auto reviewers talk about what’s coming for the Supra like a more powerful version, targa top, spy shots, renders, etc., they always keep on mentioning about the unavoidable.....manual transmission. There’s really something missing with the Supra. We just don’t know if it’s part of Toyota’s marketing strategy to keep enthusiasts waiting for a manual, or are they not building it after all.
Sponsored

 

Mr2Mcoupe

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
9
Location
USA
Car(s)
SeeSig
Pare, they will build it, we will come.
 

AsupramkvC

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gerich
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
373
Reaction score
384
Location
Philippines, USA, Japan
Car(s)
86
I wonder why Toyota has to use BMW’s 4-cylinder turbo engines if they themselves make powerful yet reliable 4-pot turbo engines. They partnered with BMW to utilize their inline-6 engine; that’s acceptable. But using the Bavarian’s 4-cylinder engines, that sounds like a no-no to me.
 

solidsamir

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Threads
2
Messages
347
Reaction score
653
Location
Philadelphia
Car(s)
sold
I wonder why Toyota has to use BMW’s 4-cylinder turbo engines if they themselves make powerful yet reliable 4-pot turbo engines. They partnered with BMW to utilize their inline-6 engine; that’s acceptable. But using the Bavarian’s 4-cylinder engines, that sounds like a no-no to me.
It takes about 10 seconds of thinking to figure out why.
 

Bryster

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Threads
70
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
1,695
Location
Los Angeles
Car(s)
Nothing,considering a Civic DX
I wonder why Toyota has to use BMW’s 4-cylinder turbo engines if they themselves make powerful yet reliable 4-pot turbo engines. They partnered with BMW to utilize their inline-6 engine; that’s acceptable. But using the Bavarian’s 4-cylinder engines, that sounds like a no-no to me.
Because their engines aren't tuner friendly
 

nigaskiga

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
65
Reaction score
85
Location
California
Car(s)
Accord
I wonder why Toyota has to use BMW’s 4-cylinder turbo engines if they themselves make powerful yet reliable 4-pot turbo engines. They partnered with BMW to utilize their inline-6 engine; that’s acceptable. But using the Bavarian’s 4-cylinder engines, that sounds like a no-no to me.
The Electronics and wiring are all pretty much BMW. I don't think hooking up a toyota engine to them is "easy"
 

twntrbo03'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
249
Reaction score
573
Location
Alaska and Florida
Car(s)
1998 Supra Turbo Quicksilver ---1993 Supra Turbo Anthracite --- 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser 4x4
Anyone else getting annoyed with the 'it looks like a 86' comment? Because we all know past Supras and Celicas looks nothing alike. :rolleyes:

Not gonna lie... I rather have a Celica GT-Four than the new Supra
 

AsupramkvC

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gerich
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
373
Reaction score
384
Location
Philippines, USA, Japan
Car(s)
86
Anyone else getting annoyed with the 'it looks like a 86' comment? Because we all know past Supras and Celicas looks nothing alike. :rolleyes:

Well, if you have a sudden glimpse at it, there’s some resemblance; but of course the A90 is a modern sports car paying tribute to the 2000GT. For me, the A90 is a mixture of the A80 and the 2000GT, with a twist aimed towards this new generation.

The Supra may had been the performance version of the Celica; but they don’t look alike. Even from the very first Supra, the design language had always been different from its Celica counterpart. It may be derived from the Celica, sit on the same platform, and was inspired by it; but the Supra always had its own separate direction, aimed towards sportiness and performance. The Supra was longer and wider than the Celica as well.
 

dgh

Well-Known Member
First Name
Darren
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
164
Reaction score
322
Location
Alberta, Canada
Car(s)
1993 RX7; 2011 Toyota RAV 4
Please explain?
I'm just pointing out that such comments "I'm not going to lie, I'd rather have a Celica GT-4 than a Supra" are really unnecessary and likely to be contentious here. Whats gained by such a comment? It's just made to drag the Supra and those who like it into the mud. I have nothing against the Celica, nor any other car that comes up here, but I don't want one. Do I make that point on every post possible? No.
 

DesmoSD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
1,968
Location
San Diego
Car(s)
1993.5 Supra TT, 997.1 911 Carrera S, 1199 Panigale S
I'm just pointing out that such comments "I'm not going to lie, I'd rather have a Celica GT-4 than a Supra" are really unnecessary and likely to be contentious here. Whats gained by such a comment? It's just made to drag the Supra and those who like it into the mud. I have nothing against the Celica, nor any other car that comes up here, but I don't want one. Do I make that point on every post possible? No.
Ah, got it. I thought you were going to come back with real strong and compelling evidence on to why you wouldn't pay $500 for a GT-Four instead of an emotional response. $500, even if it needed a full resto, I would buy it in a heartbeat. :drive:

Sponsored

 
 




Top