digicidal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,039
- Reaction score
- 1,375
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV
- Car(s)
- 2020 Supra, 2020 RX350, 2007 4Runner
- Thread starter
- #1
Although this information is available in a smattering of BMW posts on a few forums, I thought others might be interested as well. Since our manual is woefully lacking in actual specifications (in noted contrast to the Lexus manuals for my wife's new RX350) I set out to test various common file formats and bitrates for compatibility. Every format was able to be played, but I make no guarantees that some edge cases won't have problems.
My source file for the test was the title track from Tool's "Fear Inoculum" which I used dBpoweramp converter to make all conversions. It's important to note that for most people and on most systems - there will be no audible difference between these files. If you think you're the exception, you can try it out for yourself. Personally, I can consistently tell the difference between 128kbps MP3 and CD or lossless formats... however, only on 1 or 2 tracks (and listening critically for specific artifacts) can I tell the difference between 320kbps MP3 and lossless. In no cases have I ever been able to hear a difference between 320kbps AAC or WMA and lossless - but for those that are OCD enough to want lossless (I'm one)... it works with every format I tried.
Here's a summary of the formats and file sizes tested (remember there was no detectable difference in sound... so size probably matters most):
I didn't bother with lower bitrates or weird compression schemes... I think 20GB (in the collection storage) or 32GB for a $12 thumb drive make anything smaller/worse pointless in the first place. Disagree? Post why, etc. Previously I didn't have the option for any lossless formats (2016 Lexus) so it's a pleasant change. I'm positive I couldn't tell the difference, especially with the stock stereo... and definitely not while driving, etc. However, as I already have all my CD's ripped to lossless files on my NAS... it does make it very simple. I'm still likely to at least convert to 320kbps AAC just for the 50% savings in space... I'm far too fickle in my driving music preferences... so I need at least 100 CDs or so to be safe.
My source file for the test was the title track from Tool's "Fear Inoculum" which I used dBpoweramp converter to make all conversions. It's important to note that for most people and on most systems - there will be no audible difference between these files. If you think you're the exception, you can try it out for yourself. Personally, I can consistently tell the difference between 128kbps MP3 and CD or lossless formats... however, only on 1 or 2 tracks (and listening critically for specific artifacts) can I tell the difference between 320kbps MP3 and lossless. In no cases have I ever been able to hear a difference between 320kbps AAC or WMA and lossless - but for those that are OCD enough to want lossless (I'm one)... it works with every format I tried.
Here's a summary of the formats and file sizes tested (remember there was no detectable difference in sound... so size probably matters most):
I didn't bother with lower bitrates or weird compression schemes... I think 20GB (in the collection storage) or 32GB for a $12 thumb drive make anything smaller/worse pointless in the first place. Disagree? Post why, etc. Previously I didn't have the option for any lossless formats (2016 Lexus) so it's a pleasant change. I'm positive I couldn't tell the difference, especially with the stock stereo... and definitely not while driving, etc. However, as I already have all my CD's ripped to lossless files on my NAS... it does make it very simple. I'm still likely to at least convert to 320kbps AAC just for the 50% savings in space... I'm far too fickle in my driving music preferences... so I need at least 100 CDs or so to be safe.
Sponsored