šŸ‘£ Official: Toyota Announces Manual Transmission Supra!

Only interested if it comes in manual?


  • Total voters
    326
Status
Not open for further replies.

Axix23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Threads
26
Messages
3,079
Reaction score
3,242
Location
GA
Car(s)
NA
Y
A lot. 0-60 might be ok if 60 can be reached in 2nd gear, but beyond that it'll really be a lot slower. The manual will be for the "purists" lol. Don't expect many of them to sell. You have to remember, a ton of people crying about it on the internet how "it's just a BMW" and "it has to have a stick" can barely afford a new 86, let alone a Supra. They all want a manual Supra, but if they're able to afford it, is a whole other matter. I've driven manuals my whole driving life, cars and semi trucks, and it's just a huge step backwards. Next thing you know people will want drum brakes instead of disc :p
^^ you hit the money on this. I knew a guy crying about how he is waiting for a 6 speed to come out but he even if it did, he couldnā€™t afford one! People crying about the bmw crap, they drive shit boxes.
Sponsored

 

justbake

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
2,402
Location
Indy
Car(s)
F10 535i
Not all manuals are created equal. They would be stupid to gear the 6mt for 0-60 times. It makes the gearing too tall and actually ruins the driving engagement it sets out to achieve.
 

Mountain_Bound

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
119
Reaction score
70
Location
Colorado
Car(s)
16' Wrangler Rubicon, 13' 4Runner Trail, 13' R56S
You have to remember, a ton of people crying about it on the internet how "it's just a BMW" and "it has to have a stick" can barely afford a new 86, let alone a Supra. They all want a manual Supra, but if they're able to afford it, is a whole other matter
you hit the money on this. I knew a guy crying about how he is waiting for a 6 speed to come out but he even if it did, he couldnā€™t afford one! People crying about the bmw crap, they drive shit boxes.
This is exactly how I feel regarding all the hate for the mk5 Supra. Most the people complaining couldn't afford one anyways and like you've mentioned, drive absolute shit boxes.
 

Jeff Lange

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Threads
5
Messages
341
Reaction score
1,183
Location
Canada
Car(s)
AE86, GSE21
If given the choice between the 2.0 with a manual and the 3.0 without, I would go 2.0.

Hate when that's the choice I have to make though.

Jeff
 

Islindur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Threads
18
Messages
589
Reaction score
574
Location
Poland
Car(s)
Had:Yellow 2l Have: Red 3l
I checked acceleration differences between auto Z4 20i and manual 20i, 0-60 difference is said to be 0.2s so manual 2.0 Supra should do 0-60 in around 5.2s and 0-100kph in around 5.4-5.5s. Also I'd expect 1/4 mile time to be up from around 13.5s for auto to something like 13.8-13.9 for manual. For comparo: PDK base 718 does 1/4 in around 12.6s and manual in 12.8s, despite being against PDK which is even faster than Supra 8ZF. So manual shouldnt be much slower actually, max 0.5-1s to 200imo, depending on shifting ofc.
 
Last edited:

Dannyvandelft

Well-Known Member
First Name
Danny
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Threads
15
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
4,090
Location
44133
Car(s)
Ordered A91 edition Supra
Not all manuals are created equal. They would be stupid to gear the 6mt for 0-60 times. It makes the gearing too tall and actually ruins the driving engagement it sets out to achieve.
Gearing will be tall regardless. You're going from 8 gears to 6. And usually 6th is an overdrive so you're really looking at 5 gears. The gearing will absolutely be done for 0-60 times. If they didn't, a 3.0 manual would be as slow to 60 as a 2.0 auto. Sure you can thrash the gearbox into the next gear for optimal times, but it won't be able to do that all the time, where the auto can, and will. In the real world, with real world driving, the manual will be a second slower. At least.
 

justbake

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
2,402
Location
Indy
Car(s)
F10 535i
Gearing will be tall regardless. You're going from 8 gears to 6. And usually 6th is an overdrive so you're really looking at 5 gears. The gearing will absolutely be done for 0-60 times. If they didn't, a 3.0 manual would be as slow to 60 as a 2.0 auto. Sure you can thrash the gearbox into the next gear for optimal times, but it won't be able to do that all the time, where the auto can, and will. In the real world, with real world driving, the manual will be a second slower. At least.
I donā€™t think youā€™re understanding what Iā€™m saying.

Iā€™d rather having a slow manual than one a manual that is geared too tall to rev out.

And of course manuals are slower than autos, we donā€™t have to address it in every comment
 

Dannyvandelft

Well-Known Member
First Name
Danny
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Threads
15
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
4,090
Location
44133
Car(s)
Ordered A91 edition Supra
I donā€™t think youā€™re understanding what Iā€™m saying.

Iā€™d rather having a slow manual than one a manual that is geared too tall to rev out.

And of course manuals are slower than autos, we donā€™t have to address it in every comment
I get what you're saying. I think the 2.0 would benefit more from a manual. It gets the auto with the 3.0 gearing. If someone isn't worried about a slower transmission, a less powerful engine shouldn't be a problem then either. A GRMN with a manual doesn't make sense to me however. What would in turn make sense, is to give the 3.0 a manual, when the GRMN launches, since that'll be the top dog then. Kinda like how Porsche gave the new Cayman GT4 a manual, now the PDK only GT4 RS is coming.
 

justbake

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
2,402
Location
Indy
Car(s)
F10 535i
I get what you're saying. I think the 2.0 would benefit more from a manual. It gets the auto with the 3.0 gearing. If someone isn't worried about a slower transmission, a less powerful engine shouldn't be a problem then either. A GRMN with a manual doesn't make sense to me however. What would in turn make sense, is to give the 3.0 a manual, when the GRMN launches, since that'll be the top dog then. Kinda like how Porsche gave the new Cayman GT4 a manual, now the PDK only GT4 RS is coming.
Iā€™m was really only talking about the 3.0, not the 2.0. There is no performance benefit, but itā€™s not about performance.

You have it reversed, the GT4 was only 6MT
 
Last edited:

Dannyvandelft

Well-Known Member
First Name
Danny
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Threads
15
Messages
2,816
Reaction score
4,090
Location
44133
Car(s)
Ordered A91 edition Supra
Iā€™m was really only talking about the 3.0, not the 2.0. There is no performance benefit, but itā€™s not about performance.

You have it reversed, the GT4 was only 6MT
Yeah I got that backwards. They added the PDK later.
 

KahnBB6

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Threads
24
Messages
1,226
Reaction score
1,726
Location
Florida
Car(s)
'93 Lexus SC300 2JZGTE R154 LSD & 2023 GR86 6MT
This is not specifically Supra MKV manual related but this article does an excellent job of explaining the attitude and sentiment of people who still want manual transmission cars:

https://jalopnik.com/you-can-still-love-manual-transmissions-no-matter-what-1844546755

Also I do feel the best thing Toyota can do is offer a manual on the volume sale Supra 3.0 in addition to the 2.0. Even if the manual only comes in 258hp 2.0L trim, Toyota needs to adjust the gearing, add back a true LSD rear end and the 3.0ā€˜s suspension and brakes. Maybe the four cylinder will even get its own power bump when itā€™s launched with a manual? That would be good too.

But also with the limited GRMN model, while it will be getting a DCT anyway a manual transmission option for it would make totally delightful irrational sense in the same way the GRMN in any form is a delightfully irrational thing.
 

Islindur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Threads
18
Messages
589
Reaction score
574
Location
Poland
Car(s)
Had:Yellow 2l Have: Red 3l
This is not specifically Supra MKV manual related but this article does an excellent job of explaining the attitude and sentiment of people who still want manual transmission cars:

https://jalopnik.com/you-can-still-love-manual-transmissions-no-matter-what-1844546755

Also I do feel the best thing Toyota can do is offer a manual on the volume sale Supra 3.0 in addition to the 2.0. Even if the manual only comes in 258hp 2.0L trim, Toyota needs to adjust the gearing, add back a true LSD rear end and the 3.0ā€˜s suspension and brakes. Maybe the four cylinder will even get its own power bump when itā€™s launched with a manual? That would be good too.

But also with the limited GRMN model, while it will be getting a DCT anyway a manual transmission option for it would make totally delightful irrational sense in the same way the GRMN in any form is a delightfully irrational thing.
So You basically wanna turn 2.0 into almost 3.0 with all those upgrades while adding mass in the process ;)
It would have been more expensive too, still having 2.0 engine. I'd leave 2.0 as it is, maybe add mechanical LSD. Let owners mod the rest to their liking. Biggest appeal of 2.0 for me is 1395kg weight, rest I will sort out myself. Thats why manual is even more interesting coz it should weight even less. Fuji Speedway edition for EU (its basically 3.0 with 2.0 engine) that has all 3.0 goodies U ask for weights 1470kg. Just 30kg less, while having 258hp. Dunno if its the way to go.
I agree manual should be geared properly, preferably short.
Manual option for GRMN is a good idea.
 
Last edited:

KahnBB6

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Threads
24
Messages
1,226
Reaction score
1,726
Location
Florida
Car(s)
'93 Lexus SC300 2JZGTE R154 LSD & 2023 GR86 6MT
So You basically wanna turn 2.0 into almost 3.0 with all those upgrades while adding mass in the process ;)
It would have been more expensive too, still having 2.0 engine. I'd leave 2.0 as it is, maybe add mechanical LSD. Let owners mod the rest to their liking. Biggest appeal of 2.0 for me is 1395kg weight, rest I will sort out myself. Thats why manual is even more interesting coz it should weight even less. Fuji Speedway edition for EU (its basically 3.0 with 2.0 engine) that has all 3.0 goodies U ask for weights 1470kg. Just 30kg less, while having 258hp. Dunno if its the way to go.
I agree manual should be geared properly, preferably short.
Manual option for GRMN is a good idea.
That's pretty much what I'm suggesting, yes ;)

While the 3.0L can be said to be enjoyable at its stock power level before any tuning even begins I think the 2.0L will need a tune for more power right off the bat and possibly even some turbo hardware changes. Weight and weight distribution I agree will probably be very good compared to the 3.0L.

The 2.0L manual definitely needs a mechanical LSD at minimum as standard though, with the auto or manual. That's currently a glaring error that has got to be rectified now by 2.0L owners already.

Agreed that a manual GRMN is a good idea but as we know it will definitely get a DCT or other auto offering for sure even if a manual GRMN is available as well.
 

Islindur

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Threads
18
Messages
589
Reaction score
574
Location
Poland
Car(s)
Had:Yellow 2l Have: Red 3l
Agreed that a manual GRMN is a good idea but as we know it will definitely get a DCT or other auto offering for sure even if a manual GRMN is available as well.
Should give both options, auto for fastest possible lap times, manual for more engagement and let customers chose what they prefer.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 




Top