It sounds like the 4 cylinder will be an EU and Asia only model. Agree, I think the 2.0 will definitely sell better in places like Japan and Europe.
https://www.supramkv.com/threads/interviews-with-chief-engineer-tetsuya-tada.787/page-37
I really was just making a general comment to everyone, otherwise I would have quoted you.
I am aware they share platforms, but the ride on the two are different. The SC is definitely the more plush and luxurious out of the two.
But yeah, lets just move on now. :thumbsup:
First I wasn't correcting anything, I was just simiply stating that a GT can also be a two seater so you can go ahead and lose the bad attitude.
I actually don't agree with your previous post. A GT by Toyota from that era would be the Lexus SC. The Supra was definitely the more pure sports car...
According to Automobile the new G29 Z4 (170.1 in) is longer than both the E89 (166.5 in) and 86 (166.7 in). I also think the new Supra will be slightly longer than the Z4, because of the incorporated nose from the FT1.
https://www.automobilemag.com/news/prototype-drive-2020-bmw-z4-m40i-roadster/
Probably not, the last gen for example was like 20 inches longer than the S660. I agree, I would love to see both happened, a $18k-$20k S-FR (86 replacement) and a $30k 4th gen MR-2.
So in the other words if it wasn't for the awesome design team at Calty we would have gotten 1. a totally different design or 2. a rebadge hardtop Z4 with only mirror styling tweaks.
Oh yeah, the number one source of hatred for the A90 seems to be coming from Supraforums, and that place is dominated with A80 owners. Not to mention tons of them bash on Tada's prior project, the 86. Maybe more of them will be accepting once the car is unveiled and they can actually get behind...