Search results

Do a 255/40/19. That's closer to OEM circumference (275/35/19) and it gives you a little more sidewall so the tire is less stretched on the wheel. And for winter more sidewall is always good.

Leased mine at MSRP.

That's still a sizeable gap. BRZ/86 are mid to high 20's, maybe low 30's for a fully loaded one. And you have the "no manual" turdmuffins running around.

A base 2.0 should easily be negotiated to high 30's. A loaded one for 40ish would be a good deal.

Exactly.

It's as fast to 60 as a $100k base 911 Carrera. And since It's Porsche, everything is an optional extra, so it has more features too.

I disagree. They were priced VERY well at MSRP. You get a ton of performance, styling, and quality for the money. The BMW equivalent is at least $10k more, the Audi equivalent $15k more, and the Porsche equivalent $35k more.

The GT86 was designed to be a low cost entry level rwd car. It was never destined to have a turbo, 2.0 Supra or not.

Guess how many cylinders ;)

I'll send you a pm

Yes sir

Waiting for the rumored S2K with the R engine in it ;)

Those were pre production models. There are plenty of articles online saying the U.S. spec 2.0 got a mechanical diff. Guff could've had a Euro or Canadian spec car without it.

I love the Type R, but not as a replacement to the Supra. It would be a stable mate. It's a phenomenal car and I applaud Honda on the aggressive styling. Something Subaru with it's current "Camry with a wing STI" can learn from. As well as other companies. But the R and Supra have NOTHING in...

The Z4 is 60 lbs heavier than the Supra, and it has a soft top instead of a solid roof. So I'm sure the Z4 has a fair bit of bracing under the car to increase rigidity. The Z4 is also not performance oriented. That car is squarely aimed at mid-life crisis men that don't want a Boxster lol.

They could've left the mk4 wing off imo. Other than that it looks good. Making a targa involves a lot more than just chopping the roof. It's structurally integral to the car. So it would need a lot of extra bracing underneath to compensate, adding weight and losing performance. And I'm sure...

Yeah I think they don't want people putting the negative straight to the battery. That'll mess shit up. I always put the negative to a chassis bolt. That way the circuit goes through the car.

Didn't see that one, guess I'll be relocating my leads lol.

Yeah I know, but I don't want a loose hanging quick disconnect in my engine bay while I'm driving all year. You can hook up the quick disconnect in the trunk. There's a stud on the positive terminal for accessories like a tender. And you connect the negative to a chassis bolt just like you would...

Yeah I read a bunch of posts on several BMW forums before I hooked it up. Some say you can't, others say it's fine. I haven't found anything official from BMW that say you can't, or shouldn't. So I'm assuming it's fine. Edit: read a few more BMW forums, it said it's fine to charge from the...