Should Toyota Supra keep FT-1 2+2 configuration? Or lose backseats?

What do you think should happen?


  • Total voters
    26
Status
Not open for further replies.

Supra93

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
3,449
Location
LA
Car(s)
Supra & RX7
As we all know the FT-1 concept is a 2+2. But Toyota has stated a production version would be 10% smaller. Given that info should Toyota retain the 2+2 configuration? Or should FT-1 become a two seat sports car like the Corvette and Viper? Post your thoughts and comments below, and as always remember to vote in the poll.

24031024-1-21-ft-1-pic.jpg

toyota-ft-1-concept-driver-seat.jpg
Advertisement

 
Last edited:

divinesteer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
64
Reaction score
10
Location
Detroit metro
Car(s)
Toyotas
10% smaller still puts it well within the territory of other 2+2 cars. The FT-1 is a pretty large car. We all know functional backseats can be done with smaller cars a la FR-S etc.
 

910ps

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
80
Reaction score
12
Location
Midwest
Car(s)
WRX
Have to keep the rear seats if it doesn't add unnecessary size or weight or hurt the car's dynamics.

Having even small backseats might make it more appealing for some buyers considering cars that don't have them (C7, Cayman) and make it competitive with cars that do (GT-R, M4).
 

FRS-Man

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
106
Reaction score
42
Location
Eden
Car(s)
Hot Lava FR-S
Voted to keep them. Would be something nice to keep with the tradition of past Supras.
 

Craigy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
562
Reaction score
708
Location
Louisiana
Car(s)
M3, Lexus GX
2 seats is cool, but this car will be so much more than a Corvette competitor, so I voted for 2+2.
 

FXuser

Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Location
Tucson
Car(s)
M3
How about a 2+2 with rear seat delete option for true track enthusiasts? probably not even worth it given how few people actually track their cars but i can't think of any other reason someone would not want an extra 2 seats.
 

Craigy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
562
Reaction score
708
Location
Louisiana
Car(s)
M3, Lexus GX
How about a 2+2 with rear seat delete option for true track enthusiasts? probably not even worth it given how few people actually track their cars but i can't think of any other reason someone would not want an extra 2 seats.
In college I wanted 2 seats so all my idiot friends couldn't ask me to drive them around.

Now with small children being a possibility 2 extra seats doesn't sound bad.

Unnecessary size/weight seems like a waste (I hardly ever have more than one person in my car, let alone 4). But as long as they are more of an afterthought, a-la Porsche 911, I'll be happy.
 

kamran

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
35
Location
seattle
Car(s)
scion frs
How about a 2+2 with rear seat delete option for true track enthusiasts? probably not even worth it given how few people actually track their cars but i can't think of any other reason someone would not want an extra 2 seats.
2x2 is actually great for the track. I carry my gear in my otherwise useless rear seats. I fill up the trunk, back seats and the passenger seats with all my junk. That way you don't need a trailer.
 

FRS-Man

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
106
Reaction score
42
Location
Eden
Car(s)
Hot Lava FR-S
2x2 is actually great for the track. I carry my gear in my otherwise useless rear seats. I fill up the trunk, back seats and the passenger seats with all my junk. That way you don't need a trailer.
Also just great for putting backpacks, bags, jackets, etc. without having to access the trunk. Glad I have it in the FR-S.
 

Craigy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
562
Reaction score
708
Location
Louisiana
Car(s)
M3, Lexus GX
Sometimes the space dedicated to the +2 useless seats halves the storage area of the trunk, so it's not really extra space.

One thing I've liked about the Corvette is that you get a pretty copious amount of storage underneath the rear hatch glass. Similar was the RX-7, although you don't get much depth.

My trunk in my G35 I had years ago (2+2) was pretty much useless. Even a convertible Corvette had more storage.

Personally I prefer to reach into a trunk/hatch instead of twisting around to grab something out of a backseat in a 2-door car.
 

Loyo911

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
50
Reaction score
12
Location
Bay Area
Car(s)
X5
I may not use the backseats for much else than storage and occasionally having a buddy back there but I also don't want to pay more for insurance just because I happen to not have them.
 

JonMon

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
24
Reaction score
8
Location
KS
Car(s)
Cars
I may not use the backseats for much else than storage and occasionally having a buddy back there but I also don't want to pay more for insurance just because I happen to not have them.
2+2 cars cost more to insure than 2 seaters?
 

Supraman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
541
Reaction score
767
Location
FL
Car(s)
.
I say keep it 2+2. I could use the 2 back seats. But I think they'll make it like the FRS where you can slide those seats down to make it a flat trunk to fit up to 4 wheels in it. So for those that would rather have 2 seats and a bigger trunk, you have that option.
 
Advertisement
Status
Not open for further replies.

 
Advertisement
Top