Nope. You still dont understand. I'm not the one saying it isn't a defect. I'm just saying that the reason they aren't willing to look at it is because TO TOYOTA ALL THEY SEE IS BLACK AND WHITE, ON PAPER IT'S A WEAR AND TEAR ITEM. It needs to take someone at Toyota to look past the fact that...
Well, you shouldn't be in disbelief, since it IS a wear and tear part. He hasn't gotten Toyota to address the problem right? I don't think he should fight about it either. Just saying that it's a wear and tear item, as OP said himself. That's why Toyota doesn't want to do anything. Just...
Are you serious? Can you not fuckin read? I said its obviously a defect, but the reason Toyota isn't wanting to cover it is because it's a clutch and considered a wear and tear item. For the 3rd time, it's up to getting someone to look beyond that, and look into it. Period. I'm not arguing...
Clutches are always a wear and tear component. Never has a clutch been considered a replaceable component by warranty. Same as tires. Like I said, it sucks. But this is why it's a hard area to get around. Defects are obviously a different story. Thing is getting Toyota to look at it and declare...
I agree with you. And no, there is no warranty on "wear and tear" items and "consumables." This is where the issue and grey zone occurs in an instance like this. It's clearly a manufacturer issue, BUT since it technically a wear and tear item, they will heavily lean on that. It would appear to...
Famous last words from every car enthusiast ever, haha. I've said this about all my cars, and hell, I even put an intake on a TLX once, because I can't help myself. ?
My experiences are the opposite. Every mkiv, I've seen is owned by the same guy; Hector, from the Fast and Furious, trying to "go legit, and get on the NIRA circuit."
It has horrible paint, either faded red/pink or dull black. Has a bunch of upgrades of various "old school" parts, and multiple...