Right, and I wasn't weighting in way or the other. Comprehension much..
Yeah you did because you quoted me, but nice try. So you pretty much admitted that you were the one that derailed the thread. :thumbsup:
Then maybe you shouldn't be commenting about a "turbo 86" ;)
mkay...
Last time I checked it was a free forum. Wasn't aware that only owners are allowed to post here. I also never said anything about picking a 2.0 or 3.0. I wasn't even talking to you. Also pretty sure that you were the one that...
If you take the whole conversation in mind we were clearly talking a "hypothetical turbo 86". If they made one I would bit. :thumbsup: But they aren't so I'm holding off for the next Z.
How so? A WRX is a $27k-$32k car. Did I ever say Subaru = BMW "quality"? Since we're on the topic I'll gladly take a "cheap" Subaru over a high "quality" BMW which would probably start leaking oil and fluids and spitting out a million codes as soon as the warranty is out. :p
I don't think you...
This is especially true. People just wanted Toyota to slap on turbos, intercool, better brakes for an extra $5k or so. Not a watered down $43k Supra ($47k with options).
Maybe, but we need an official break down from Toyota to know for sure. Discounted "new" 2020s could also be inflating the numbers. We also know that not all dealers are on or list everything on Autotrader, Cargurus, Truecar, Cars.com etc.
This topic kind of harken back to the MK4 NA vs Turbo discussion. A lot of the NA owners I have met said if they had known back then what they know now (resale), they would have gladly paid extra for the GTE.