They both have their plus and minus, but the Z's interior looks cheap. The materials look like cheap plastic used in GM cars during the early and mid 2000s. Since that's where must of us will be spending most of our time I vote Supra. The only reason I might be tempted with the Z is the manual...
:yes:
Woman killed in Md. crash was set for trial on DUI, gun charges 2 days later
https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-killed-md-crash-trial-dui-gun-charges
Just hit $8.5k...
The C8 stole the Supra's thunder because the final product was a disappointment compared to the FT-1. I'm agreeing with you that it doesn't have to be a "mid-engine" to look good. But the overall design was compromised because they had to fit a FT-1 shell over a Z4 platform. IIRC you pretty much...
Ok cool.. I never said or disagree that a hypothetical A90 with the rear engine wouldn't have still been a Cayman fighter. Again, just for shear looks. Using the Cayman for example I think it looks better than the Supra.
Eh, LFA looks generic imo. I would say proportions and design are key.
Let's cut it down to just sports and sporty cars. The manual rate for the M2 and 86 is like 50%. I believe with the C7 depending on yr was anywhere from 40-30%.
Lots of people think the Supra is fugly. To each their own. How about we wait for the official unveiling?