thedude
Well-Known Member
My point about not discounting the driver is that if you have a light one and a heavy one racing each other, small differences in vehicle weight can be almost entirely (if not entirely) negated if you have a heavy driver in the light car and a light driver in the heavy car...Oh I knew Your point from the begining, its just I dont agree on disregarding his opinion just because he prefers lighter feeling cars and for that reason he prefers 2.0 handling. Dont get me wrong, I liked 3.0 a lot when I drove it. In fact I'm getting Supra early next year. But I did wish it was even lighter, would have been even sharper car. So I can understand where is he comming from. His opinion doesnt make the 3.0 bad suddenly, its still hell of a car.
There is nothing to debate about actually when it comes to weight in a sports car - lighter is always universally better as it affects positevly every important aspect of the car like braking or handling. We are not talking big fat comfortable limousines, but lets leave that alone.
For the sake of comparision we assume statistic 75kg driver, shouldnt we...?
Anyway, we all enjoy the car, is it 2.0 or 3.0 for whatever reason, and thats why we all are here![]()
Lap time is lap time. If a heavier car can beat the light one (oftentimes they do, just look at the Car and Driver Lightning Lap annual), then where’s the advantage?
They report the Supra they ran in the Lightning lap weighed 3372 lbs. Many of the cars in this list of all time best laps are heavier.
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/g15336568/lightning-lap-times/
Sponsored