- Thread starter
- #61
Right, we don't have any proof for a 2+2. Really wish spy photographers would take some interior pics so we can put this to rest. Yes, there are areas on the prototype that look smaller due to the door curving in more; vs the MK3 which is more straight. In the comparison below the cabin and overall length does appear to be proportional to the MKIV, so I think there is room for backseats of some form if they choose. We'll just have to wait and see.yes it can be deceiving but there is nothing hinting that the supra replacement will be a 2+2...all the mule pictures merely show a shelf in the back which I assume is part of the liftback trunk kinda like the MK4's...yes, the space between the door and the rear arch on the MK3 is a bit small but it is still proportionally longer than any of the mules we have seen..if they stuff +2 seats, gosh the packaging will be a joke...
...and I don't consider such +2 seating to be "useless". I have taken many trips with 4 people in my 86, 240SX and Celica plus not to mention how much more practical it is for daily items..I would much prefer +2 seats but if they are going in this direction it better be a damn good 2 seater..
I never said all +2 were useless. I was just using the SC430 as an example and other have said 911. Sure some are more practical than others, but in my opinion these two really are useless. Personally it doesn't matter too me, this will not be my daily or people hauler.
Sponsored
Last edited: