Search results

Or perhaps they think it is a better value in the used market :hmm:

Most of them wouldn't want a Supra name slapped on a $25k vehicle, in house version or otherwise. Albeit I do see a lot paying for the car just for the name alone. Dang Toyota's marketing department is clever.

You're right, I've expressed my opinion... time to move on. No one else worth discussing with here.

Oh so now because I have a different opinion, I'm whining. Must be the new millennial thing like "totally lit". I don't have to address your points. I can respond with my own opinion just like everyone else, whether you like it or not. This thread is to discuss just that. IMO, the dyno numbers...

You are acting like I didn't state in my previous comments that I'm not aware of the other versions of the A90. But since you obviously didn't bother reading, I'll again repeat myself. Once that hotter version hits production, hopefully addressing my dissatisfaction with the current model - the...

Look at my post on the Dyno thread over 2 hours ago then get back to me. Again read my previous posts where I explain my rationale for it. It is my opinion, though seems like maybe an unpopular one on this forum. Almost seems like I'm asking for a Veyron on a Civic forum. SMH. I'm having to...

No one is arguing princess... a forum is for discussions. Apparently you didn't read the thread title either... Good one Sherlock. Did it take you a while to think of that educated response?

The NSX example was meant to convey the difference in power the two cars make between generations with the new Supra severely lacking in that aspect compared to NSX and GT-R. Read my previous posts and try to comprehend for a second. What does your post have to do with me not caring if Toyota...

The A80 made 20hp more than Corvette did in '93. The A90 makes 125hp less than Corvette in 2019. It was also compared to a 964 turbo and even Ferrari 512TR, not simply a Cayman. The A80 was also on par with GT-R horsepower, now its down by 230+. So yes, I'd say it hasn't drifted very far from...

The problem is not that Toyota made a high performance car that is attainable for the masses, but what it lacks with the name / performance expectations set forth by the A80.

Meh.. that's in the "middle" of the spectrum. IMO, a Supra should easily surpass and exceed this.

QFT. Correct on the Terminator Cobra, another great example. So what does the modern equivalent 2020 GT350 and GT500 make power wise? Oh yeah.. 526hp and 700hp respectively.

Never said it did. Speaking solely from personal experience and desires.

It's gone because too many people are ok with mediocrity.

Again... why are we talking about the masses here. Read my previous posts, its a Supra not Celica or a Mustang. It would be a great car if it was a Celica. As a Supra though it shouldn't cater to the 95% of the population, thus my statement for shame earlier. Is it a niche market, absolutely...

This still doesn't address the in-house development, rarity, etc. Not to mention a lot of those reviewers were compensated for travel by Toyota so I'll take everything they say with a grain of salt. I don't see a problem here. I've specifically stated "best for my money and needs/wants", this...

Impressive. Can't wait to hear more about the GRMN version.

Thanks, but I figured that was pretty obvious from my earlier comments....

No, I'm asking Toyota to build he Supra, again.....

Because one can experience an emotional attachment to a vehicle, especially when its something unique. This especially applies to sports cars that are meant to excite. A halo car is supposed to do that ten fold, from nearly every aspect. Why do people always strive for greatness over...