Search results

I wouldn't count on it..the problem isn't emissions (especially for Toyota who has the best overall emissions & fuel efficiency ratings)...it is us, the consumers, as not enough people buy them any longer. The 86/BRZ is one of the few cars that have more manual buyers than auto but it still...

...but logically would it make sense for Toyota/Lexus to put the 3.5 TT into the Supra and price it close to (or less than) the RC F? Sure the Supra and RC F technically shouldn't fall in the same class, but I would think some potential RC F buyers will be turned off to the fact that the most...

..a little late to the party, there is a thread about this already...the more interesting question now is since the Lexus LS is already at $72 K and the new one is projected to be more, how much will the Supra cost? The MK4 had a MSRP of $40 K ($62 K in today's money). They won't be giving it...

:popcorn:

:bow: because toyota has something better than i8?

lol if toyota uses bmw's i6, what will toyota actually contribute? their direct injection? :popcorn:

you just said it though, we aren't getting an inline, what is there to discuss lol bump the 3.5 TT thread and let's talk about pricing, that is certainly going to be a worthwhile discussion than this dead idea of an inline 6 having anything to do with the supra's future

the FT1 is indeed swoopier but that is barely scratching the surface, we can make a list of differences between the FT1 and this mule.. The two biggest disappointments that I can tell so far are the proportions (I prefer 2+2 over 2 seaters for FR coupe setups..) and how tall it looks especially...

no duh, we all saw it...you missed the point..I was basically asking why bump this thread?

why? the nose is what gives it its flair..the FT1 is beautiful, any toning down will just bit a letdown especially after the LC... admittedly these renders look ok and do closely follow the mules but still cant help but feel very meh from the original hype

pipe dream, the "supra" aint getting a straight 6 as the only toyota model with one while the nsx/gtr have to use existing engine platforms shared from other models..

I would actually be a bit shocked if this came with a manual. I imagine Toyota will follow Honda and Nissan with their trans choices. Remember, this is a cost savings project ^^ ...now the most interesting question is how much will the Supra cost. Do they price it higher or lower than the...

if the S-FR and this Corolla are true then technically Toyota will have more than 4 sports cars in the lineup with the 86. (even more if we include Lexus models)

I know you're talking about appearances, I was merely asserting that those changes shouldn't really be something to write home about...just because it comes from the factory that way, in truth it is the same concept as adding a body kit. I care much more about the mechanical aspects. And if...

you're listening to the exhaust in virtually all those clips which is not really accurate unless you ain't driving..you can easily give a Miata a better sounding exhaust than that lol..sure you can hear some of the exhaust with the top down but the intake and engine sounds are not very pleasing...

Lol what? You're in the minority..I thought virtually everyone thus far has agreed the Fiata sounds like crap and nearly all reviews much prefer the driving dynamics of the Miata.. ...they won't share any sheet metal as though that is somehow going to affect the powertrain and driving...

no duh? this is exactly why I was never prepared to accept such an outcome....if the BMW/Toyota rumors were all true then obviously this was the only possible outcome, what else did you expect? The Supra will be the 124 Spider and the Z5 will be the Miata (the conclusions about the Fiata/Miata...

Lol. The camo concern, ok, no kidney grill camo on the mule, so it automatically means the FT1/Supra :) The dates around the SC/MKIV Supra wasn't my argument...clearly the main point went over your head. It was merely to show that Toyota is in the exact position coming out with the LC which...

grasping at more straws.... :s you would be the first person to think the convertible 300ZX is a roadster. Just because it has no roof and has two seats doesn't mean jack shit..that convertible is a variant of a 2+2 not the other way around...I think Toyota needs some big time hype men like you...

...should I also put a picture of the 240SX? Tell me who calls the 240SX and 300ZX as roadsters? From wiki: Roadster: A roadster was an open two-seater possibly with a frame that required actual assembly (i.e., not retracting) and separately installable soft side "window" panels – offering...