Search results

Incredible progress on the tool. This makes me think of how lazy MHD is to not have their own dedicated software. Have you thought about making your own flasher tool and datalogger? Because I think that should be your next step you are almost there. Regarding the MG1 tuning + strategies, if...

yes you have corrected me by showing the logs which did prove your point that slip could happen on 190% load and raising the torque map fixed it. There is no argument on this point. i understand that Funktionsdokumentation explains the information you are saying, im not disagreeing on a...

what i was trying to say, raising last column to 300% load and 1135nm achieves what bryan is trying to say partially. my point is the car was not calibrated to go beyond 200% load, so by extending last column you are telling the transmission to raise the line pressure as the car making more...

thanks for sharing the snapshot, what i find most interesting is that the datalog has clutch slip percent, i didnt know that was available on AT supra I guess that makes the tuning alot easier since you dont need to guess if you have shift flare by ear. does the supra uses adaptive shift time...

Not arguing, im saying torque should be scaled proportional with power increase and dyno mapping. I understand how a torque based ecu work this is not limited to bmw even gm uses the same concept.

Extending the last column proportionally should increase line pressure while making more power so i doubt it would cause a slip, scaling up the whole table should be on dyno, assuming the car is actually making more power below 180% load. i assume with pure800 you should only push the torque...

thats great that you managed to find the issue and fix it but dont forget to optimize your tune.

its difficult to say without looking at a log with the issue clearly happening. from the previous log it seems there are too many issues that needs to be solved before we can pin point the issue. some of those issues could be causing limp mode in 1-2 gear but the only difference it might be...

My own car 6mt stock only downpipe and 30% methanol in tank. this is the same tune i have posted as base map for 6mt.

Not just hpfp, you have couple of rf and torque limiters codes, you are overboosting in some area and underboosting in others, you maxed out the end of injection timing window. you can even run more timing and better afr curve. a proper tune will get you 8.5 seconds easily.

You have an Rf max 2 code triggers, which is a boost set limit. This can be caused by high IAT, but I think there might be another issue, possibly mechanical, and not necessarily heat-related. first you need a custom tune to disable rf max 2, then we can look at other issues. you can dm me if...

Running low timing will make it also difficult to control turbo speed, try adding 4 degrees of timing on pump gas or 10 degrees on ethanol. then adjust your compressor and wgdc tables again. Another thing you can do is raise your boost target to 25psi. those few things might be enough to fix...

You still have 131072 code, which is closing the throttle down to 41%. What are your Maximum Relative Filling Characteristic table values? and check if you are limited by other load limiter tables. You might want to look at all load limiters, which I believe are 10 tables (some are already...

From the log, it seems you are hitting the end of injection limiter (RF Max 8) and the cylinder fill Limiter (131072). You need to lower the values at the end of injection. You can make it 70 above 100 load. And for the 131072 its basically a cylinder fill. It usually cause by overboosting or...

yeah its fine you can share with me your tune and datalog, for direct injection afr my rule of thumb is to target 1 point leaner than port injection or what you would target N/A in port injection. 11.5 would be 12.5 to me, but you still need to account of driving style and egt. i would target...

Learned to tune MHD from MHD tuning guide, BM3 tuning guide, ECUTEK tuning guide, RazorLab tuning guide, and RFP tuning videos. however I first started learning to tune in 2018 from HPAcademy, Evans Performance Academy, Greg Banish, and other sources but I highly recommend HPAcademy for...

An intake manifold and interchiller might be better than pure600 for iat. stock turbo is great until 19+ psi then it runs hot. e50 gunk is better than gasoline carbon deposits, and i doubt it would become a real issue for you. just to clarify i didnt mean MHD has self tuning, i meant B58 DME...

Catless dp and an aggressive tune really wakes up the car and makes it much more fun to drive, you can easily do a rolling burnout on third gear with a high boost tune. Stock exhaust and catless dp sounds great it idles at around 78 decibels and 90 decibels at 3000rpm not loud but sounds great...

It might effect the drivability it might run rough, but the ecu will compensate for the difference and would be safe to run but not recommended. it’s easy to build a custom tune similar to ots 93. dm me your rom id if you need help.

MHD is great but the issue is lack of support on the xdf definition file. Its not difficult to define them if you have another definition file for a different rom, you can use hex editor to search for the address. i can help you getting started to learn to tune and its honestly simple but...