Search results

No need to attack me over a platform (which is used in far more S58s than MHD/BM3 btw). There's simply more demand for it. Topic was S58 tuning and I contributed. I like this thread, so lets not tarnish it. Its clean timing, not "no corrections", but rather "no corrections that actually lose...

V28+ has no shift redux, but MTs don't have it anyway. I am actually testing MT shift redux with Terry this week. You are looking at dme_bt, not ecu_psi. MTs need to underboost. ecu_psi+target=boost

I mean, theres no corrections lol. You know damn well I got everything I could out of that setup 😂

S58 absolutely a cheat code lol, even on JB4 https://datazap.me/u/coloneladama/log-1759327768?log=0&data=1-4-11-14-18-25-26-27-28-29&zoom=114-148 Just midpipe and E30 on an otherwise stock car. >600whp easily

Both look fine to me. If you have a dragy or something you can verify which is faster. Map 6 is only 1 psi more so it shouldn't be anything drastic anyway.

few corrections, nothing major. can add a little more E. trims are fine

E35 is ideal for most power but E40 can work on some cars.

if you are on E20-E25 map6_15 map6_20 map6_25 map6_30 map6_35 map6_40 map6_45 map6_50 map6_55 map6_60 map6_65 map6_70 3 3 3 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5 5 4.5 4

Closures are so small, I wouldn't mess with it. Boost2 curve looks smooth. Looks good

looks good!

yeah, try a different station. should be good to go when you have better fuel. Of course any ethanol or octane booster would help too, or even WMI for that matter.

Yes, correct. Those are the equivalent parameters with JB4 Pro

correct, drop duty 2500 and 3000 by 5 and try again. Not sure if the little closure at 4500 is duty related or you hit a bump. confirm with another log duty5500 to 55 too. Try to get ecu_psi to be about 1-1.5 psi below dme_bt entire pull

Let him have it on Map 6 lol at FF 40 (save after switching maps). Shift around 6200 to beat him lol map6_15 map6_20 map6_25 map6_30 map6_35 map6_40 map6_45 map6_50 map6_55 map6_60 map6_65 map6_70 3 3 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 5.5 5 4 3 (don't...

Stick to 2-2.5 gallons per tank. E20-E25

correct, could be a good fit for cars on 93

Truth, especially on 91 ACN. Targeting lambda 1 with 10+ degrees advance is asking a lot even at stock boost levels. I don't even recommend JB4 if that's all you have. 91 non-ACN is marginal on Map 1 as you've seen. of course there is the option to IAT spoof at 130-140 which will lower base...

Map 1 is fine to use, corrections are pretty minor. I'd just drop Duty 2500 and Duty 3500 by 5 for those big throttle closures.

IMO the new version has its benefits. lots of people always ask "well my timing is lower than this guys" Yes, but that is lower base timing, doesn't mean its a correction. The new firmware just shows corrections for 2-6 and ign1 stays as its always been (ie. actual ign advance) Its because BMS...

Ah yeah I see it is an MT. It looks good to me with the E85. Agree with Pete on the 93 only isn't great timing. You're probably fine to leave boost control as is if it feels smooth.