Search results

Great progress on low RPM behavior now. Quite happy with this map now for my MT. 2 logs included https://datazap.me/u/coloneladama/colonel-mt-success?log=0&data=1-2-3-4-11-15

Getting better. Try it at with FF set to 40 and log again

Yeah I have no idea how reliable that 0-60 actually is so don't take it so seriously. Logs look pretty good. Run 2 had the cleanest shifting. Others boost spiked a bit on shift, so I recommend turning up autoboost redux till Boost2 stays relatively smooth through the shift. ie, turn it up by...

@Phantomx I could probably get JB4 working well enough on any MT car but it's not gonna be perfect. Occasional hiccup here and there. Also, like Jesse said - it takes a lot of time and revisions, so I could give you a base map and a rev or two but it's too much work to not get paid for ? so...

Correct and no, nothing more is needed to run Map 2.

Ah yeah okay, you definitely need to do your duty biases then... catless will make JB4 run like shit otherwise. I really wish BMS would make this info more well known but they don't want to be involved in any emissions related stuff since they're in Cali. start with these. get me a map 2 log...

Are you stock downpipe? looks like a lot of throttle activity (ie. slight overboosting)

Great price indeed. Seller likes to mod his cars more than driving them though ? I dunno how people can put 10k+ into a car in great mods to drive it a few hundred miles a year and sell for a huge loss lol

Looks pretty good. See if turning up autoboost redux improves your shifts. Boost could be a bit smoother on the shift from the log.

@FLtrackdays, let me know if you still ever want to dial in that mild track map! We can try something like @i3igpete said : 2-3 psi max over stock with a taper up top. Should be possible since you are on 93 I'm curious to see some track logs and how much the car can take at high temps.

My PPF/detailer guy didn't need to do any corrections on my car before full frontal PPF, as I had it dropped off with like 100 miles. Maybe you can barely see some "orange-peel" at certain angles and lighting, but no micro scratches that I could find with lights. Full car was ceramic coated as...

Yeah some cars struggle a bit more with absolute maps. Send your latest Map 2 log and I'll see if there's any room for more.

Here's a log from this AM on my MT running something similar to Map 2. 1 gal E/93. https://datazap.me/u/coloneladama/log-1710163727?log=0&data=1-2-4-8-20&solo=2-4 Still working things out under 4k a bit, but car is feeling strong. notice how ridiculously low FF needs to be on an MT.

map is too hot up top. timing is horrible. 5k+ boost needs to be dropped. why not try map 2 and see how timing looks then? if its still no good, then you'll need better fuel.

20 psi at 4k quite easily

Got some good news for my MT people coming soon... ;) Newest firmware I'm testing for Terry (BMS) has gotten additive boost control working nicely. If you were catless/high-flow+JB4+MT , you should know additive doesn't work at all... Still tweaking a few things on my end to adapt to the new...

Either will be a good fit for 93. One is additive, one absolute boost targeting. Take a log with both, upload to datazap and link here

Map 4 + duty_15 duty_20 duty_25 duty_30 duty_35 duty_40 duty_45 duty_50 duty_55 duty_60 duty_65 duty_70 27 27 27 27 30 31 34 43 50 52 55 55 enjoy

Agreed. not the car for me, but the 550hp 3.0T hurricane? Few 6 cyl engines that can hold anything to the B58/S58, so curious to see how it does.

It can but not necessarily. Stock tune would be fine at e30-e40. JB4 is usually happiest E20-E25 in my experience recently, but some cars can handle more.