Sponsored

Formula 1 Talk

Denton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
359
Reaction score
435
Location
BC, Canada
Car(s)
23 MT
So here's a question then, reading online that, according to the regs, FP3 & quali have to be delayed because "FP3 cannot start until at least 18 hours after the conclusion of FP2." & "Quali has start between 2-3 hours after FP3"...

So will FP3 & Quali be delayed into the early morning hours OR will they (FIA/whoever) break thier own regs and bring it forward but still keep the 10 place grid penality for Sainz because those regs are immutable?

1700238012533.png
Sponsored

 

NitroYellowMKV

Well-Known Member
Silver Sponsor
First Name
Phillip
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Threads
53
Messages
2,240
Reaction score
3,266
Location
South Florida
Car(s)
2023 Burnout A91 MT
The penalty is BS. That is totally unfair to Sainz. Really feel bad for Ferrari. Regardless who you support it is just straight unfair, It was not on them that someone dropped the ball with track prep, they are lucky no one got hurt. Ferrari should appeal and make a big deal out of this, hell I would.
 

Dannyvandelft

Well-Known Member
First Name
Danny
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Threads
17
Messages
3,154
Reaction score
4,599
Location
44133
Car(s)
Ordered A91 edition Supra
The penalty is BS. That is totally unfair to Sainz. Really feel bad for Ferrari. Regardless who you support it is just straight unfair, It was not on them that someone dropped the ball with track prep, they are lucky no one got hurt. Ferrari should appeal and make a big deal out of this, hell I would.
Absolutely right. But then you'll get claims of "he hit me, I had nothing to do with it." And so on. It'll never stop.
 

J29DB03

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
2,289
Reaction score
4,663
Location
US
Car(s)
2021 3.0
Absolutely right. But then you'll get claims of "he hit me, I had nothing to do with it." And so on. It'll never stop.
Yep, definitely a slippery slope. I’d say F1 should be able to separate damage from “racing” vs damage from other reasons, but we all know F1 is too busy getting in its own way at the moment.
 

johnnyskids

Well-Known Member
First Name
Johnny
Joined
Mar 2, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
370
Reaction score
434
Location
New Brunswick Canada
Car(s)
Civic Si (sold) Acura Integra Type S
The penalty is BS. That is totally unfair to Sainz. Really feel bad for Ferrari. Regardless who you support it is just straight unfair, It was not on them that someone dropped the ball with track prep, they are lucky no one got hurt. Ferrari should appeal and make a big deal out of this, hell I would.
Not only should they not be penalized but the cost of these new parts should be exempt from the cost cap as this was an error due to FIA and track incompetence.
 

NitroYellowMKV

Well-Known Member
Silver Sponsor
First Name
Phillip
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Threads
53
Messages
2,240
Reaction score
3,266
Location
South Florida
Car(s)
2023 Burnout A91 MT
Not only should they not be penalized but the cost of these new parts should be exempt from the cost cap as this was an error due to FIA and track incompetence.
100% this is the type of shit about the Fia that ruins f1 imo
 

gixxersixxerman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Thomas
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
680
Reaction score
1,196
Location
Las Vegas
Car(s)
2020 Supra
Not only should they not be penalized but the cost of these new parts should be exempt from the cost cap as this was an error due to FIA and track incompetence.
Its not really going to effect the cost cap. the parts and replacement parts are already built. If this was the start of the year or middle of the year they would have to make replacements. But with this being the 2nd to last race of the year they don't have to make any replacements since they already have enough as Vasseur stated.

Maybe it will be like Maylasia and the track compensate Ferrari like they did to HAAS then when a manhole messed up his tire and damaged the car. (im not holding my breath though)
 

gixxersixxerman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Thomas
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
680
Reaction score
1,196
Location
Las Vegas
Car(s)
2020 Supra
LIberty Media, FIA, & F1 could careless about what is fair as long as they make money.. thanks to drive to survive - although i liked it before, it is ruining the sport, I think..
Isn't that what it's about. Hell, the teams are doing everything they can to not allow GM and Andretti in because of money. The more they make the more they distribute. For us its about racing, for everyone else but maybe the drivers its about the money.
 

FLtrackdays

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Mar 6, 2022
Threads
33
Messages
5,075
Reaction score
4,970
Location
Florida
Car(s)
2022 Supra 3.0 (sold), 2025 Z06, ND MX5 Club, VW GTI MK7.5
The FIA team principals press conference was pretty cool to watch. Kudos to Toto for losing his shit when they suggested this is a black eye to the Vegas venue. He couldn’t contain himself. Pretty fun to watch. And poor Fred… I do feel for the guy no doubt. But it sounds like many of them have been there before at other circuits.

In the end we’ll have to see how the race goes to really call Vegas a win or success. And even then, as Toto said, it’s going to take many years and hindsight to button down any new event.

My wife tricked me and made me watch the “pregame” show or whatever they called it. She was suppose to watch it and lemme know when she was done so we could watch P1 & P2 together. I’ll be damned. It was way better than I expected, except the drivers at the end. I think they could have left them out of it. Maybe because I’ve only heard ? about it, it was way better than I expected.



Also, the travel marketing worked imo. I thought I was done with Vegas. Just not my thing. But now, I’d go to this race for sure! Great hotels, probably the least stress on the spectators, everything is close, no favelas (like in Brazil) to fear for your life. Count Vegas high up on my list of F1 events to attend.
 
 








Top