Modal170
Well-Known Member
I can't imagine a Supra fending off a 370Z, that's not where the car needs to be at. I am aware the 370z is an aging platform on its way out and a 400z is to come, but that car wasn't applauded for its looks, instead, for the driving experience it can provide on the cheap. I did originally note that it feels Toyota wanted to get reviews on the feel, experience and character of the car and not so much the grunt. Considering how long it's been and we still don't know price, fuel, weight, power and so much more on a prototype car 90-95 percent done makes me think either they are running out of ideas, which I doubt, or are planning for a grand debut when it's their turn to reveal.What’s confusing is...
Six months ago.. we heard the Supra will be a proper track car while the Z4 will be a GT car.
Then we heard the z4 is also a proper track car.
Now the Supra is a execellent road car while the Z4 is a track weapon.
They seemed to have switched souls. Tada has mentioned that he was building a proper track car and didn’t have any consideration for back seats etc as he had when he had engineered the FRS/BRZ. Now all that seems to be negated with this review from MT.
Also the lack of power and comparing the car to the 370Z and maybe if Toyota dials the car in it may even be as good as a Z4 is super sad given that we were lead to believe that Toyota had the upper hand in the handling department.
Sponsored