Search results

O1 https://www.bmwblog.com/2018/10/31/bmw-b58-tu1-technical-updates-bring-388-horsepower/

Its on par with the Cayman's 0-60 times and has more torque through out the powerband

They are using the new head design which is a TU motor

BMWBlog claims BMW of North America officially announced 3.9s as well but there are no source links to confirm https://www.bmwblog.com/2019/01/14/bmw-usa-announces-the-official-0-60-mph-time-for-the-z4-m40i/

BMWBlog did testing in the new M340i and they claim the car would have hit 3.7s if they were aiming to record a 0-62 time. Even if that isn't accurate, the car can sure get up there https://www.bmwblog.com/2018/12/12/bmw-m340i-xdrive-0-100-km-h-0-200-km-h-launch-control/

This is what I find to be the most difficult to process. Not the actual number but the lack of weight savings over a convertible

The 3 spoke is way nicer but didn't come out until 98, maybe we will see a better wheel in 2023?

No no no, thats solely BMW's design language Am I the only one who doesn't mind this steering wheel? I have seen a lot of hate for it but its way better than a MKIV 4 spoke.

All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_car https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_car

Thanks atleast I can read

Well then your definitions differ from actual definitions

So you'd consider a miata a performance car? A BRZ/GT86 a performance car? A cayman a performance car? A hellcat a sports car?

A sports car

This isn't a performance car so its not.

I havent been 16 in a long time, there is more than just a number in terms of performance

That question is irrelevant to my comment. Price to HP ratio isn't the only thing to look at when looking at performance

Are you thinking its that cut and dry?

Literally posted that exact pic earlier this thread

The profile looks like all long nose coupes*