Search results

Guff pretty much covered my thoughts on it, aside from if Toyota does one of those shadow teaser things they're known for from time to time. In any case, due to the hype building around this car, it actually does more good to stay tight lipped about it all until the show and then pull out all...

yeah, you definitely want a DBA versus the older CBA... they fixed and updated a ton of stuff, and I think part of the reason the later car was/is better is because it literally sold for like $25k more on release. the nicest ones are the 2017+ though IMO; that updated front/rear and interior...

Could be, but being that they didn't mind making the Infiniti I don't think they care. The GTR is a $100k+ supercar near the end of its generation, and it makes near 600hp AWD.

Funny you mention that as I just watched the Engineering Explained video on YouTube that covers that technology.

Yeah man! tunability is awesome too, guys are making 450whp+ with exhaust and ECU flash lol ($1k) I hope the new Supras output can easily be bumped like that too...

agreed! I still think it's going to be great for those that want that :) hard to argue with 800lbs less and near same power level haha

what do you think is under my hood? lol VR30DDTT, direct injected twin-turbo :D the 2L turbo is available as the base engine, then theres the 3L like mine, and there's also a hybrid one.

I wish Nissan would do the Z with the 400hp VR30DDTT in my Q50-RS. Add a 6spd manual, and I'd probably trade my car in for one.

My Infiniti Q50 RS came with 400hp... I bought it used, a year old, for $35k, but they are like $50k new. (Infiniti depreciation ftw lol) It's a sedan so not super comparable, but the Q60 RS is more comparable aside from weight, but given the Supras specs I don't think I'd switch personally...

these articles have become something I actually enjoy reading because I sit there and wonder, if this information is that far off the mark then what about the other stuff they report on? that said, I think Forbes is generally quite good when it comes to reporting on business, tech news, etc, so...

yep, 2020MY and always has been

yeah, they monitor this board im sure... I haven't had any close calls thankfully, but still rather play it safe

glad you guys picked up on what I was referring to, but yes akin to the FT-86II debut almost production, but not quite in other words. although it may be closer than that car was aesthetically speaking.

launching at Geneva doesn't mean production car guys :) think FT86 in terms of comparisons...

I can already see how irritating it will be to not be able to answer some of this stuff :(

haha, at this point not a lot of what we see is going to shock anyone... we have long covered the important parts. that said, there have been some welcome additions and small things here and there that are cool. not much longer before this car is out there for everyone to enjoy.

Well, the old adage that nothing is ever impossible comes to mind, but the front end of the new car is essentially what you see on the test mules (the Enzo style a-frame), only they have made changes to the splitter over time. The rear end is where most of details are hidden, both in the...

the roof is composite, so those A-pillars likely are as well and may even be blatantly exposed with no one realizing it lol

yeah, that segment is just weird... if you have $100k then I don't think they give a damn about an LC500, but maybe they do lol.

I'd buy the DB11 (Vantage appears to cost the same?) if I was in that segment... prices aside, the DB11 weighs 600lbs less, and makes 130hp more lol. I'd argue the DB11 competes more with the upcoming LC-F, but to each his own. Then we'd be talking because you'd have a car that IS designed to...