Search results

I did but with new upgrades comes new issues 😂 trying to figure out 262144 limp. Think it is overboost on the shift. Triggered after a few hard 1-2 pulls and seemed to reset after 10 min driving. Probably time to go custom!

I just got 262144 limp mode today, wouldn't clear with the codes. Just drove for another 10 minutes and power came back. It is possible it was from "overboost" because I was banging off 1-2 shifts a few times before I lost power. I do see more corrections in the following logs compared to last...

my duty fee was $40 coming back from femto. Seems consistent. @RyanA90 I think you will be really happy with the upgrade to E40 OTS from JB4. The extra bit of power isn't even the best part. Customization, map switching, throttle response, no rev hang, burble adjustment, disable cold start, no...

I drove my car for 2 weeks post unlock on stock map until MHD went on sale :)

I don't know if the number means anything tbh, I tested pretty much everything 1-5 and I could see that JB4 would delay WGDC more on spool. Yeah no guarantees it still works but I could see if I can send you my firmware.

He changed the way FF is targeted, but I can't remember exactly what. It works just fine, just relies more on the DME PID. Absolute maps work same as always. I never liked the PID on with additive. If you try to align WDGC to FF you'd just get throttle closure, so only way it'd work is with...

Nah it can go way more than 6, but PID is irrelevant since it is off on additive maps now. WGDC=FF. Terry said calc_tq is straight from DME

600 eu down to 250

I'd think it was more related to EGTs or IATs than fuel starvation, but datalogger will tell. There are various reasons the car could go into a "soft limp mode"

Its just a voltage offset for wastegate position, essentially the JB4 WGDC variable is meaningless other than 50 being neutral. <50 is lower duty cycle, >50 is higher. What you are saying is something I recently tested with Terry. It may still be enabled on newest firmware (34+). Under E85...

Bingo. Unfortunately if you are getting these "typical MT cuts" and calc_tq is already below 48 prior to the cut, the best solution is drop the boost a bit at that spot. Here's a table below for what my max recommended boost by RPM is before stutters become hard to avoid (MT only). These are...

Yes, you can run up to E35 or so with the fuel pressure connector installed. The user input is FOL (fuel open loop). Recommended between 60-70. Just raises fuel pressure a little which reduces trims, injector pulse width. It will not affect timing as AFR will continue to be mid 14s.

Great data. Yes, I've seen that high-elevation cars on 91 struggle on timing even on stock map. I likely wouldn't recommend JB4 to someone in that situation unless they have access to ethanol like you. Just some more random information - Map 2 on JB4 is VERY similar boost targets as MHD 93 OTS...

I'd keep dropping it by 5-10 until boost is more like 18 psi. timing is still rough

I'd drop FF by 10 and see if timing cleans up a bit

All good options, you are on the right track.

boost control is fine, just try to get your octane up

Awesome, thank you! Does it mean there is actual slip or just to prevent it? Looks like load is held flat.

Well I finally flashed MHD today. Got 93 in the tank, so just Stage 2 93. Only had time for a 20 minute drive, but here's my thoughts (compared to jb4): This 93 OTS map is almost as quick as my custom tune JB4 E30. Low end is way punchier, top end is a little less. No surprise with the much...

Serious upgrade, congrats