AND borings as fuck, but anyway.At thread of the day I own one and like her a lot so who cares.
I still think they shouldve done the MT on the 2.0L. Why ruin a fast car with human intervention. My STI and Golf-R are faster on the streets (legal speeds) than a MT Supra..pretty stupid if you asked me.![]()

Yes but in an auto there ARE faster options for similar money. When we are talking quick manual cars at this price point, well that's another story altogether.You manual owners go from 0-100 real quick. I'm pretty sure @zrk is saying people pick the supra in general because it is quick and punches above its weight class regardless of manual or auto.
There aren't many better options for the price range and class. And drop a couple thousand and it does even better.
The supra stock regardless of transmission is faster than a majority of what's on the road.
You know what stops the new Z06 from being a super car? The same thing that stops my mechanically identical SC300 from being a MK4 supra. There is a plumber who has one or at least one that looks just like it.If anything, the car is extremely underrated…
No need to publisize your ED issues?AND borings as fuck, but anyway.![]()

I make a point directly related to what you had to say. I have driven some of the cars you mention in automatic/DCT guise and they are all boring as fuck. Deal with it.No need to publisize your ED issues?![]()
You quoted me to attack me.. I just replied to your attitude as I always do to anyone, playfully.You on the other hand, choose to attack me personally. Go you. You won the Internet today.![]()
So....modded vs stock then? Reason I ask is because it's pretty easy to make any car faster if that's your thing.....My STI and Golf-R are faster on the streets (legal speeds) than a MT Supra..pretty stupid if you asked me.![]()