I found a table today that interests me a lot in fixing MT shift knock.
So I believe I have figured out what causes it. It is EZA (Einspritzausblendung) aka Fuel cut-off. It is a tq management path for big changes in torque when it cannot be handled by ign reduction alone. You can tell this is...
Has anyone actually paid <55 for an MT at all? Regardless of mileage?
I paid 59 3 years ago and figure I could sell it today for 55 if needed.
I figure depreciation will never be worse than ~2% per year.
not that I plan to sell, but ya know life happens. I feel like its irresponsible to...
Not sure, I have flashed 3 times this week already. Same thing every of the probably 10 times ive done it in total. Just diag mode, maybe because I had the car in gear?
But yeah without fail, battery CEL and "contact toyota" on the drive every time.
Several Driver assistance errors on idrive, CEL for a battery code every single flash lol. Clears fine.
Car definitely has a little aneurism while being flashed but takes 10 seconds.
Probably yeah! It doesnt really make it into the cabin with windows closed but being parked definitely makes the smell pretty bad within minutes.
If the car is moving, ive never smelled it.
Awesome, thanks!! I will likely tweak the partial-to-full blend table(whatever its called) as well. It seems to me that mhd+ control needs to kick in a little sooner if I want it to spool this quick. Just dont really know how to adjust it.
I was able to lower WGDC base in the lower boost target range without any issues spooling up (spool definitely uses different logic, not mhd+). Was previously under the impression that boost targets<10psi would be default 100%.
this helped the partial throttle behavior (when MHD+ boost target...
Shouldn't knock, throttle will manage it as it is supposed to at partial load. Are you looking at manifold pressure?
if you find yourself lugging too much, just drop the boost targets significantly below 2500
You may lose some response with the strategy you are considering
Spool pretty much sits at 100% WGDC then starts to blend to the MHD+ WGDC somewhere around 5 psi below target from what i've seen.
that is why I re adjusted the Y axis breakpoints of my p-table. If its not using MHD+ logic when boost deviation >5psi, then clip it there and get more granularity...
don't, it looks right for under 2500 :) Always at 100% under boost threshold rpm
This is a good starting point for WGDC base, I'd probably drop another 5% across the board as you always want a positive PID response.
Yes, the P table (and D) is a WGDC% adder
Here is what mine was in the log I...
Its not even hard to fix it genuinely, I hardly know what I'm doing yet on MHD and had shift boost spikes resolved on Revision 2. @QTR FMS - This is MHD+ boost control at .2 psi deviation with a barely tuned PID...
I hardly know much about MG1 yet but there's very few MT owners self tuning (probably single digits), so if you have any questions about mine let me know. Or we can share some data and try to figure it out. There are some MT issues to work out I wouldn't mind some R&D collab with.
Sure it does...
clutch protection limiter tables. Ask @razorlab nicely and he may help you define ;)
and yes, skip the compressor table stuff. Use MHD+ WGDC base override and PID override, its very straightforward "classic" tuning strategy. I had better drivability than OTS even on my base map.
https://datazap.me/u/coloneladama/log-1771531155?log=0&data=2-3-6-17-33-34-35-36-37-38&solo=2
pretty big shortcomings... here's shift behavior you can expect. Don't worry, MHD says you can always just "shift better" or use NLS (no lift shift). Its not their job to make a map that works with...