Search results

My alarm also went off on the highway - you can thank the giant panic button on the key that will get pressed by anything in your pocket.

Never had any pull to a certain direction with factory alignment or after I had TBR do an alignment for me on my MT. These PSS tires vibrate like crazy 60-70 though despite alignment and balance in spec.

I'm going to be constructive rather than continue this shit-flinging. Here's how you could have navigated this situation: "Hey guys, I bought the rights to sell this kit that I didn't design or manufacture but do QC for." Use your own photos. If I want to spend 5-fuckin-thou, I expect to see...

Enjoying my car in the blue ridge mountains mostly, not embarrassing myself online ;) Just take the L and move on, fighting with people in this thread isn't going to help anything.

What a wonderful dose of cringe to start the morning:coffee: > *attempt to scam the supra community* > "the whole internet is trolling me"

Glad you were able to do this comparison. I never had JB4 with stock downpipe to test.

Agreed - I was seriously close to buying a Z4 M before they announced the MT supra. After boxster prices went up, I anticipated Z4M to follow suit.

No doubt, similar spec and mods as my MT, albeit higher mileage. I definitely wouldn't sell mine at 62? PPF alone was likely 3k+ on top of a 59k msrp.

Good deal, price is definitely quite a bit lower than what seller has into it. GLWS

Same where I live. Saw a brand new GT500 pass by and no one turned their heads. I think people just aren't really sure what the Supra is. People always ask me cuz they have no idea.

Pretty fascinating scatterplot. Thanks for sharing.

Hm, well let us know what you find out. I feel like if you set the targets to what you said, you may just introduce some throttle closures on spool up. Who knows!

Has anyone run a ROM-compare on any MT cars yet? Couple questions - Does an MT car use the same tune as an AT car once unlocked? ie MHD/BM3 OTS Does a 2023 MT car have a different method of load targeting than 2023 AT? I am trying to figure out why JB4 behaves so differently with an MT car...

I honestly don't pay much attention to any of the values below 3000 since you should rarely go WOT there anyway. I would recommend just putting whatever DME_BT reads for any RPM below 3000 to run stock targets. To make it a passthrough basically. Your log suggests that value is about 14-15 psi...

I would too at 80 since that's crazy. Not 70 though.

Should have just bought a JB+ then ? not really though

It's pretty normal to need to raise Duty bias values for 5k rpm+ to get near target. That's why BMS recommends the EWG cable when running higher boost. Adding the downpipe usually requires dropping duty bias below 4500 as well since it makes more boost than intended with stock wastegate...

Yes, you are on the right track. Since you get consistent throttle cuts around 5k, consider dropping DB down a couple there and 4500 a little as well as you mentioned. You can keep PID at 20 for now. @razorlab , agree timing still needs help. Should start climbing around 4k and peak over 10 deg...

https://www.supramkv.com/threads/fs-armytrix-catless-dp-jb4.19545/

The FF value under user adjustable is just FF gain , it doesn't specify what the actual FF datapoints in your log are gonna be. Those are a function of RPM, FF gain value, Duty Bias values, pedal input, boost targets, and a few other variables.