back to 2.0 vs 3.0 debate ... Facebook?

[romanLegion9574]

Oh really? I thought 93 was recommended for B58 in general. Maybe that led me to believe the manual for the 3.0 said 93.....Good to know

We on the west coast of the USA get 92 (WA) and 91 (CA and OR). So we do with what we have.

Sponsored

 

[romanLegion9574]

I took my 2.0 down to the Dragon last month. Crusing at 85mph on the highway it was pulling 38mpg. I doubt my 3.0 manual will get close to 32, but I don't care. I think the 2.0 with a manual would be a much better car than the 2.0 auto.

@WSUPRA and I did an economy run on our way to the track last year (his is a '20 3.0, mine is a '21 3.0 with some bolt ons). He got 38-39 mpg and I got 35-36 for the ~100 mile highway trip going between 60-80mph. Fuel economy differences are really negligible.

 

[WSUPRA]

@WSUPRA and I did an economy run on our way to the track last year (his is a '20 3.0, mine is a '21 3.0 with some bolt ons). He got 38-39 mpg and I got 35-36 for the ~100 mile highway trip going between 60-80mph. Fuel economy differences are really negligible.

Here is the picture to back up this insane claim. The 3.0 can be super efficient. MPG only dipped down due to hitting minor traffic as we got closer to Shelton.

Sponsored