DAW Ultra Flow Turbo Dyno Results

2021Supra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
99
Reaction score
108
Location
Alabama
Car(s)
2021 Supra, 2021 Lexus RC300, 2007 Tundra, 1975 Ch
FBO and catless on DAW we did 480whp on 93 and 565 on E35. tuned by Sam. This is a91-mt. For reference. Was hoping for closer to 600 whp but was told Sam didn’t think it was a good idea for anything above 35 or he saw potential knock or some thing. Car pulls smooth and strong all the way to redline in 2nd 3rd and 4th.
That is really all that matters. As long as you are happy with the results and the car feels good.

Sometimes I ask a question: What's more important a number or reliability and how the car feels? I would believe that most anyone that follows this thread, would want the first and last. Why? Because its bragging rights..... ;)
Sponsored

 

Jesse DaBears

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
First Name
Jesse
Joined
Aug 26, 2020
Threads
54
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
1,669
Location
Illinois
Car(s)
A90 Tungsten Supra 3.0 Premium
I don't want to hate on DAW or your numbers. I'm currently running an ots and a catless dp with an intake + resonator delete. I'm planning on going with remnant once I have enough money. However, I've seen people with full FBO getting 530-520 whp on 93 with pure 850 on a 2020 supra. and 2021+ getting somewhere around 540-530ish whp. I know DAW is one of the more quality and is more consistent, but isn't 480whp on 93 low for a turbo upgrade? you can push 480 or even 500whp with just a catless dp and E.
Results all vary. Dyno numbers are just numbers.

Heres a 93 car that made 550 whp on a daw.

1705689666887.png


1705689819337.png
 

2021Supra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
99
Reaction score
108
Location
Alabama
Car(s)
2021 Supra, 2021 Lexus RC300, 2007 Tundra, 1975 Ch
Yes sir. I have been talking to him through PM for the past few weeks. Trying to figure out his Visconti LPFP and relay issue. I believe he has it narrowed down. Super nice guy!
 

i3igpete

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
327
Reaction score
254
Location
Chicago
Car(s)
2023 3.0L 8AT
If you have any questions, post up....

414959973_1435730113804847_5927890032816525503_n.jpg
Do you have a screenshot or log of the boost on that pull? Just curious how the heads flows with a larger turbine, and whether you had to continue ramping boost to maintain that flat torque curve past 6k
 

2021Supra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
99
Reaction score
108
Location
Alabama
Car(s)
2021 Supra, 2021 Lexus RC300, 2007 Tundra, 1975 Ch
Do you have a screenshot or log of the boost on that pull? Just curious how the heads flows with a larger turbine, and whether you had to continue ramping boost to maintain that flat torque curve past 6k
You are the second one to ask me something similar. Sorry man I did not think about doing a log until after I did the final pull. I asked the shop owner, what he saw on my P3 Gauge for the boost psi. He said, "Man, I didn't even look over that way. I was looking at the computer on the wall and the car's cluster." Is this something that Botti might could answer for you in the tune?
 

D3ad_Hand

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 23, 2022
Threads
24
Messages
566
Reaction score
572
Location
UAE
Car(s)
2022 GR Supra / 2019 Y61 Nissan Patrol
Results all vary. Dyno numbers are just numbers.

Heres a 93 car that made 550 whp on a daw.

1705689666887.png


1705689819337.png
Now these are better looking results. However I still prefer Remnant or pure850 result. Because with FBO you can achieve these numbers. This is using PI and an LPFP. However, these are phenomenal results.
 

2021Supra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
99
Reaction score
108
Location
Alabama
Car(s)
2021 Supra, 2021 Lexus RC300, 2007 Tundra, 1975 Ch
Yes sir he had very good results. After I posted my results on the dyno, I went back and looked at the logs from the final revision from Botti. My street file versus dyno results were slightly different. Torque was up to 567 as compared to what the dyno showed. Which is more reliable? lol. I will always go with the higher result. lol. 😂
 

razorlab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan / Briana
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
4,698
Reaction score
9,378
Location
Your moms bedsheets
Car(s)
Not a Corvette.
Yes sir he had very good results. After I posted my results on the dyno, I went back and looked at the logs from the final revision from Botti. My street file versus dyno results were slightly different. Torque was up to 567 as compared to what the dyno showed. Which is more reliable? lol. I will always go with the higher result. lol. 😂
Are you looking at the torque in the datalog as reported from the ECU? If so, that is not 1:1 with what the car is actually doing. It's a torque request. Many factors can skew it wildly.

Also it's in Nm unless you switched it to lb/ft.
 

2021Supra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
99
Reaction score
108
Location
Alabama
Car(s)
2021 Supra, 2021 Lexus RC300, 2007 Tundra, 1975 Ch
It’s the torque request. That’s why I said I will always go with the higher number. Lol. I know it’s not 1:1, but I was just being funny 😆.
It’s measured in NM, but when compared to ft. Pounds, it was 566.7. Again it was the torque request. 👍🏻
 

_Sp1ral0ut

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Jun 29, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,989
Location
SC
Car(s)
2021 Supra 3.0, 2021 Tahoe, Razor E100
@_Sp1ral0ut guaranteed me two weeks though.
Give the guy two weeks - he'll cave. Look - I didn't want to put this out there directly. But, I found my old Captain Crunch decoder ring in a box in the closet. I decided to give it a shot and decoded some posts on IG for the DAW UF. The message read "daw ultra T51424. hoter thn a t kettle. n 2wks" For a while I wasn't sure if it was true, but now I know I am right.
Sponsored

 
 




Top