Strych9
Well-Known Member
Just to follow up.
The electronics engineer (let's call him Drewseph) I mentioned is sorting through packaging, weight, and a handful of other things to decide between fully electronically driven and electro-hydraulic.
So far, this is what we have:
Raspberry pi with a table base. Handful of IF statements written in. Things like:
IF throttle position >#% AND steering angle <#°, THEN # AOA value.
IF Brake pressure >#% AND steering angle <#°, THEN # AOA value.
Things like temperature (air density), sunlight (shaded track isn't as warm), run duration (tire heat) all affect aero and grip so those would have to be built in as well. Small changes but still.
Tables have to be adjustable.
He is looking into how to pull all the input data. If anyone knows an easy way to pull it, let me know. It doesn't seem to be much of something I need to watch over since he has made a few self-driving cars out of cars that are not self-driving from the factory so getting all that data is nothing new to him. There are also write ups on how to pull data from the supra and make it self-driving, but that is all above my head and 100% his wheelhouse.
Tables get fed into a simple algorithm and a final value output to an interface, then to the motor/pump assy., which feeds two linear actuators. On failure, all values have to go to somewhere between max downforce and max drag AOA (entry stability is #1).
Actuators would be mounted in the vertical portion of the uprights and a simple linkage to pull the second element to desired AOA. Bottom of the uprights would have to allow for tubing to the actuators. I'm guessing 1/4" SS tube or so, then braided all the way to the pump.
I'm personally a fan of ultra thin wall chromoly aerofoil tube for the uprights. It has the space inside, easy to work with (just weld it like carbon), easy to replace it if you hit a bird or some shit, and it's relatively cheap compared to laying up a carbon fiber piece and bonding everything together. If not chromoly, I can make lay carbon fiber. If not that, I can surely figure out a simple exposed aluminum solution that is visually appealing. If not that, idk like wood or some shit.
Need to pick a wing and second element profile that suits what you're after. Luckily, info for a ton of wing profiles are readily available online so I can 3d print a to scale version to shape the mounts without having to have the actual wings.
I reached out to my aero buddy and his response was "You can figure it out. Text me when you have some track data and feedback."
More details coming soon.
The electronics engineer (let's call him Drewseph) I mentioned is sorting through packaging, weight, and a handful of other things to decide between fully electronically driven and electro-hydraulic.
So far, this is what we have:
Raspberry pi with a table base. Handful of IF statements written in. Things like:
IF throttle position >#% AND steering angle <#°, THEN # AOA value.
IF Brake pressure >#% AND steering angle <#°, THEN # AOA value.
Things like temperature (air density), sunlight (shaded track isn't as warm), run duration (tire heat) all affect aero and grip so those would have to be built in as well. Small changes but still.
Tables have to be adjustable.
He is looking into how to pull all the input data. If anyone knows an easy way to pull it, let me know. It doesn't seem to be much of something I need to watch over since he has made a few self-driving cars out of cars that are not self-driving from the factory so getting all that data is nothing new to him. There are also write ups on how to pull data from the supra and make it self-driving, but that is all above my head and 100% his wheelhouse.
Tables get fed into a simple algorithm and a final value output to an interface, then to the motor/pump assy., which feeds two linear actuators. On failure, all values have to go to somewhere between max downforce and max drag AOA (entry stability is #1).
Actuators would be mounted in the vertical portion of the uprights and a simple linkage to pull the second element to desired AOA. Bottom of the uprights would have to allow for tubing to the actuators. I'm guessing 1/4" SS tube or so, then braided all the way to the pump.
I'm personally a fan of ultra thin wall chromoly aerofoil tube for the uprights. It has the space inside, easy to work with (just weld it like carbon), easy to replace it if you hit a bird or some shit, and it's relatively cheap compared to laying up a carbon fiber piece and bonding everything together. If not chromoly, I can make lay carbon fiber. If not that, I can surely figure out a simple exposed aluminum solution that is visually appealing. If not that, idk like wood or some shit.
Need to pick a wing and second element profile that suits what you're after. Luckily, info for a ton of wing profiles are readily available online so I can 3d print a to scale version to shape the mounts without having to have the actual wings.
I reached out to my aero buddy and his response was "You can figure it out. Text me when you have some track data and feedback."
More details coming soon.
Sponsored