H2O_Doc
Well-Known Member
I think the braking test should be taken with more than a grain of salt. Think about how many feet youāre traveling per second at that speed. Then consider if any of the drivers could be a tenth of a second or a half of a second (who knows) different in when they brake. I think the error bars on this one are understandably big. Could explain the difference.They did run flat 12.0s in the dry with 3.0 there, lowest for 2.0 I saw was I think 13.2s so the gap is actually big in dry conditions, while in wet it becomes quite narrow due to problems with traction.
Also, this 2.0 is equipped with SportPackage with LSD and Brembo brakes, I wonder why it stops worse than 3.0. Its not 100kg lighter tho, they are wrong, but still it should stop at least simmilar to 3.0. Maybe different pads?
Sponsored