KahnBB6
Well-Known Member
On this I agree with you especially as to vehicle naming and how it can only partially or not at all line up with the past thing it's supposed to be referencing.I'm talking about the concept of lineage and how car companies think when they name cars. It's all bullshit. Car companies will rename/chop/change and ascribe "lineage" based on projected sales and market research.
The 45th anniversary is an example where they decided to include the Celica timeline because it fits their schedule, lol.
The worst possible examples I can think of in recent memory, one of which was already mentioned above are the "Mustang" Mach E crossover and the "Eclipse" Cross crossover. Neither new vehicle, of course, has a single thing to do with a Ford Mustang or a Mitsubishi Eclipse.
However here I must once again ask you to be far more specific.Don't believe the hype.
Which portion of what "hype" exactly should I not be paying attention to in relation to the GR86 successor detailed in the BestCar article? Which specific points from the BestCar article do you feel are more likely to be just hype versus other points mentioned therein?
There really isn't any mention of whatever Toyota plans to do with the name "Celica" in that article. Toyota *could* use that name instead, sure. Or not. We'll see.
Sponsored