_Sp1ral0ut
Well-Known Member
I understand your point but...can't a car be fast but not quick and the reverse can be assumed as well? I mean - let's take a heavy car that tops out at 300 mph. It takes 20 minutes to get to its top speed. It is indeed fast, but man it's not quick. And we take a car that tops out at 94 mph but gets there in 1.00000239 seconds. That's pretty quick, wouldn't you agree?Oxford, Merriam-Webster and Roget's Thesaurus all disagree, but it's all good. ?
edited for: not being a dick btw.
Reminds me of a kid one time. He asked how fast I've been in the Supra. I just bought it so not very fast. Anyway, I said "around 140, I guess." He said "oh that's not fast" I responded "Every car in this parking lot has the potential to do 140. It's how quick you get there that matters."
Sponsored