BimYotaZupra
Well-Known Member
I dont think the Z looks all that bad. It just needs alil help in the fake vent department to look more "exotic".
Sponsored
they are just trying to build up hype and product awareness. no differences from all the other automarkers when they do the same thing by featuring concepts and protytypes in commercials.How is it that they’re advertising the car in commercials but yet no pricing or trim levels released?
-RJM
Everything but the front of the new Z looks fantastic. I really like the back end throwback to the 300zx.I dont think the Z looks all that bad. It just needs alil help in the fake vent department to look more "exotic".
it won’t have the same feel. Science guarantees it.when you say “refinement” what do you mean? What will the new Z car not have that the Supra does?
all BMW’s start that way. Give it a couple years. She’ll be rattling down the road like a stick in a bucket of rocks.it won’t have the same feel. Science guarantees it.
The A90/1 Supra has a chassis that’s stiffer than even the Lexus LFA & you can definitely feel it compared to other cars. Very,Very Rigid and refined ride.
The Supra just screams refinement. Everything inside of it is TIGHT and well built. I can assure you the 400Z will have but loads of thin, flimsy and cheap plastic all over the place. Nissan will have to cut corners somewhere & I bet you it’ll be in the interior, which is the place YOU will spend most of your time in while operating it. There’s very little cheap plastic in the Supra. It’s all carbon fiber, patted leather.
The Supra also does a better job at making you feel like you’re in something exotic. The windshield is small, the roof like aggressive and the car has much more design elements all around.
for the money, I’d say the Supra is better.
Odd that you seem to like all the above. A lot of people have complained about visibility issues, hitting their heads on the low roof, and the strange need to place fake vents throughout the car. I guess to each their own.The Supra also does a better job at making you feel like you’re in something exotic. The windshield is small, the roof like aggressive and the car has much more design elements all around.
Honest question: why are you here exactly? The only posts I see you on are about other cars and back hand insults to the MKV. Seems like you and a few others are visitors from other forums only present to disparage and cause trouble. If you do not own, or hope to own, a Supra, why are you here? Would seem to be a waste of time.Odd that you seem to like all the above. A lot of people have complained about visibility issues, hitting their heads on the low roof, and the strange need to place fake vents throughout the car. I guess to each their own.
Another insecure Supra owner I see. Sorry I didnt realize you needed to own one of these to be allowed to post here. Some of us just like chatting about cars. I forgot this generation needed their safe space ?Honest question: why are you here exactly? The only posts I see you on are about other cars and back hand insults to the MKV. Seems like you and a few others are visitors from other forums only present to disparage and cause trouble. If you do not own, or hope to own, a Supra, why are you here? Would seem to be a waste of time.
Right, but I just thought it was alil odd that he seem to really like that feature.Most sports cars have ingress/egress and visibility issues. Nothing new. Go to car meet where there are sports/exotic cars and you'll watch people struggling to get in and out. Lol.
The visibility in my Supra isn't much different than my 370Z or 350Z. And I don't see it being much better in the new Z.
Also, fake vents have been around since the 80s. Again, nothing new. Nobody bitched about it when the flamboyant 3000GT came out. Lol. Have you seen the photo edit of the MK5 without any of the vents? They add visual interest and character.