I see that there is a mid and full size. Is there any reason to go with the full size or will the mid suffice?The one from EOSPlates is very good too.
It allows for plenty of side to side incremental changes as well as angles. It fits perfectly just below the bumper line under the headlight and is slightly recessed so as not to snag on anything.
![]()
![]()
I went with the smaller one.I see that there is a mid and full size. Is there any reason to go with the full size or will the mid suffice?
Can you provide a photo from the front of the car?The one from EOSPlates is very good too.
It allows for plenty of side to side incremental changes as well as angles. It fits perfectly just below the bumper line under the headlight and is slightly recessed so as not to snag on anything.
![]()
![]()
In the garage, but should be an okay pic...Can you provide a photo from the front of the car?
Exactly what I wanted to see. Thanks!In the garage, but should be an okay pic...
![]()
Of course the mid will suffice, that’s why they make it lol, but I have the full size for one specific reason... protection. Either way your plate will cover the bracket, so I wanted to be sure I have full corner to corner plate protection.I see that there is a mid and full size. Is there any reason to go with the full size or will the mid suffice?
Yes, considered them both. My thoughts are that they might be significantly more restrictive of airflow (I have zero data to go on, however). Having said that, I like the appearance much more: I’m not a huge fan of off-center plates (I kinda like off-center people, however).
Also the sto n show would be even lower so less of an issue, but the Carbonio mount works better for a UK plateI've got the Carbonio one, mounted low. The bottom inch or so is blocked off anyways as the Supra is over cooled as standard otherwise. It doesn't affect the car as a daily driver. If I were to take it on track then I could take it off with an Alan key in 2mins if it was an issue.
Just a thought