Sponsored

The A70TTR Dedication Thread!

OP
OP

A70TTR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Threads
8
Messages
2,729
Reaction score
10,077
Location
Japan/EU/USA
Car(s)
ST205 GT4, JZA70, JZA70 TT-R, S210 Athlete
Moto-san commented on a post that the production car is 250lbs less than the M2.

I expect a variance based on market as per usual, but that gives us pretty good idea.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Blupra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Blu
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
121
Reaction score
256
Location
PHX
Car(s)
BMW M2 and Honda S2000 - both 6MT
Moto-san commented on a post that the production car is 250lbs less than the M2.

I expect a variance based on market as per usual, but that gives us pretty good idea.
For people to lazy to google. M2 weight:3450lbs ish so that puts the supra around 3200
My M2 'feels' small, light, and fast. Sounds like this Supra is going to be smaller, lighter, and faster! Now lets just hope its equal to or less than 2016-2018 M2 prices and not closer to 2019 M2 or M3/4 prices.
 

MA617M

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2017
Threads
23
Messages
2,302
Reaction score
5,164
Location
Australia
Car(s)
lots
Wet mass, without driver:

M2 manual = 1495kg
M2 DCT = 1520kg

250lbs = 114kg

therefore

A90 1381kg - 1406kg (3038 - 3093lbs)

That feels optimistic.... but please, let it be close to 1400kg flat.
 
OP
OP

A70TTR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Threads
8
Messages
2,729
Reaction score
10,077
Location
Japan/EU/USA
Car(s)
ST205 GT4, JZA70, JZA70 TT-R, S210 Athlete
The figures I was getting for a DCT M2 (US spec with extra safety bs) were around 3500lbs, meaning 3250 for the Supra.

So, ~1475kg.

I could definitely see other markets saving quite a bit more, as the Euro M2 DCT is quite a bit lighter apparently.
 

Kicol33t

Member
First Name
Sandro
Joined
Aug 24, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
14
Reaction score
61
Location
Norway
Car(s)
RAV4 C-HR
If i remember correctly i heard 1495kg, and I was like.. well yeah that is below 1500kg but only by 5kg
 

elpadrino

Well-Known Member
First Name
eL
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
136
Reaction score
197
Location
n/a
Car(s)
Lexus RC350F, bmw E92, ducati monster
graphene is another big one, and Toyota is pushing hard for hydrogen fuel cell (which is my bet for the future long term).

on the grid side, nuclear is absolutely the way to go, but we have to push all of the ignorance/fear around it out first.
I'd like to hear more of your thoughts on this. I've always wondered why Japanese companies(and their government) push Hydrogen Fuel Cells so much when everyone has moved to battery power and are slowly eliminating most of the pain points associated with it. Reminds me of the video format wars where the best tech usually lost out to the most popular one and proved disastrous for some companies.
 
OP
OP

A70TTR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Threads
8
Messages
2,729
Reaction score
10,077
Location
Japan/EU/USA
Car(s)
ST205 GT4, JZA70, JZA70 TT-R, S210 Athlete
Well, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are actually electric vehicles, but they solve a few issues that are unlikely to be resolved in traditional EV any time soon: no battery packs so FAR less weight and no worry over replacement, they can be "recharged" in as little as 10 minutes at a fueling station, and generally speaking have the ability for further range than traditional EV (Tesla Model S range—300+ miles—in smaller/lighter/cheaper package).

IMO, they are vastly superior, but an infrastructure change would have to happen soon for them to be viable.
 
Last edited:
 








Top