soundman414
Active Member
My fear has been that these legacy icons are being reborn without the built reputation they need to go upmarket, and the NSX proved to be a perfect example. It is a magnificent piece of quality engineering, fast and pretty good looking... But it's not selling well. There are a few reasons behind this, and some of the big concerns for buyers that spend that sort of cash, is prestige, collectibility, value retention, social status, exoticness, etc. No one yearns for a new $150k NSX, instead, they'd want a Ferrari or Porsche — both of whom have received almost non-stop praise for the last 15 years and have steadily and iteratively improved upon their cars to the craze worthy status they have now. No one feels the new NSX will greatly go up in value, or that it will be a rare car that people lust for. It also doesn't scream exotic, especially if you looked inside. For these reasons and more, the NSX didn't live up to the expectations Honda/Acura set out to meet. Had they focused on a $50-60k car, that the everyday person could obtain with hard work, and it delivered on performance, we would be having a very different impression of the NSX."The Supra will be by Gazoo," stated Shigeki Tomoyama, the man in charge of the sub-brand, while Akio Toyoda himself insisted that the new Supra needed to be more aggressive than what was originally planned, a conclusion he arrived at after driving a pre-production model."
This indicates that a possible reason for the delay was the re-definition of the performance benchmarks. The statements clearly show that the Supra was initially intended to aim at a more low-level performance, something that changed later on during development. This was based on the fact that the CEO wants to attract the classic Supra audience having in mind the 3.0; Twin Turbo RWD JZA80.
Something similar happened with the Honda NSX as well during development. Initially intended to be an FR V10 NA platform, then changed to its current layout with a 3.5V6 NA , then performance wasnt satisfying and went on turbocharging.
This can only be good. I would be dissapointed if i saw a Toyota badged Z4. This seems to have changed....
The same can be said for the Supra now, with it being out of the minds and garages of people for almost 20 years — it has a reputation to rebuild. Very few people would consider a $70k+ Supra, even if it was given the best praise from every auto journalist out there (just look at the Alfa 4C). If you are going to buy a car that costs that much, you buy something that has the aforementioned qualities that can't be engineered, only earned; prestige, collectibility, value retention, social status and exoticness. These qualities come with time and are earned through continuous improvements and reaffirmations of those qualities through a variety of mediums.
Toyota needs a Porsche 996 moment to relaunch the Supra name with a value proposition to gain market share and the hearts of enthusiasts, and then they can march upmarket. The higher they try to place this car in the echelons of performance icons, the harder it is to sell this as a first offering. I also find it hard to believe that Toyota wants another super low production performance car in their lineup — as the 86 has proven that Toyota isn't willing to fix major shortcomings of a car to sell it better (e.g. power, non-Prius tires, etc), and proves that journalist praise can only go so far in selling a product.
Sponsored
Last edited: