Huckleberry
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #1
From an engineering standpoint with the downpipe at a fixed diameter and controlling the initial flow into the exhaust system, why is there any gain by splitting into 2 larger pipe diameters? Q=AV right, and continuity principles apply do they not?
I could take my garden hose and run it into 2 large culverts, but I don't think it gets me anywhere.
I can see reduction in friction losses, but can't believe that is a huge deal in such a short run such as this exhaust is. Isn't this a "well it looks cool thing"?
So, I am as guilty as the next guy of doing things for looks (and sound) - why not, its fun and otherwise we would still all be driving '65 Ford Falcons.
But curious what the pipe flow engineers have to say.....
I could take my garden hose and run it into 2 large culverts, but I don't think it gets me anywhere.
I can see reduction in friction losses, but can't believe that is a huge deal in such a short run such as this exhaust is. Isn't this a "well it looks cool thing"?
So, I am as guilty as the next guy of doing things for looks (and sound) - why not, its fun and otherwise we would still all be driving '65 Ford Falcons.
But curious what the pipe flow engineers have to say.....
Sponsored