Sponsored

B58 JB Plus Quick Install Tuner ....

jtsang25

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2019
Threads
72
Messages
2,578
Reaction score
2,494
Location
Canada
Car(s)
2009 BMW 135i, 2020 Toyota GR Supra
So is 93/94 octane the preferred option? I only have 91 in my area. Anyone turn it all the way up on 91 octane and have issues?
 

MoTeC_R

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Aug 13, 2022
Threads
17
Messages
669
Reaction score
918
Location
Ohio
Car(s)
A91-CF
Is this the highest setting?

BC2CA0E2-11D7-4419-8D8D-5830A3504359.webp
Looks like your one notch off but I was curious what the difference was it’s set for 4psi at 3 OClock and the 2 ticks past is 4.5psi.per Dave at BM.

“The JB+ is adjustable from 0psi over stock to 4.5psi over stock using the white adjustment dial. Adjustment is made using a small screwdriver to turn the white inner dial. Do not turn the entire blue potor you may damage the JB+. Towards the "max" setting indicates more boost "min" setting indicates less boost. The default setting of 3pm on the dial is ~4psi over stock.”
 

ColonelAdama

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
1,646
Location
Greenville, SC
Car(s)
2023 Absolute Zero Supra 3.0 Premium MT, 2015 GTI
I’m ordering one for my 6 speed , I’ll report back
Great, looking forward to your results. I've got to finish the break-in on my MT but would love to get a JB in it. Use a dialed in map6 JB4 (E30 fuel) for 7+ years in my GTI and its incredible. Figured it would be excellent on the Supra, but hesitant due to insufficient feedback with the MT.
 

Crypto79

Banned
Banned
Banned
First Name
John
Joined
Dec 5, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
256
Reaction score
336
Location
Washington DC
Car(s)
2023 Supra A91 MT, 1997 sc300 5 Speed
I’m ordering one for my 6 speed , I’ll report back
So I installed it this morning. The connector was tight and took about 5mins of wiggling with the care and fear that only working in a plastic intensive engine bay can impart. Then like magic it popped off simply as if I hadn’t been doing the same motions previously & frustratingly unsuccessfully before.

I took the car out and slowly warmed it up on my fav river drive in the DC area. Of course freezing rain started to lightly drizzle which is a risky proposition in the Surpa in the best of times. Once up to temp, I was able to open it up on some straights and these are my impressions.

For 230$ bucks, I’m not accustomed to actual performance differences. And the Engine / throttle is absolutely noticeably different. Smooth, powerful and more urgent with the JB+cranked up to the max setting (why not right) as I have a fresh tank of 93 plus octane boost just to be on the safe side. If I had to guess the majority of the gains are at lower RPM as the turbo (from a limited sample) appears to get to peak boost (new peak?) earlier opposed to a more gradual and linear climb in the OEM setup. You really feel the extra push early, by 7000 rpm it feels pretty similar to stock-ish. there may be some over clocking of the turbo with usable extra boost making extra HP ( torque efficiency) up at the very top but it isn’t earth shattering. The difference is the boost shove coming quicker and harder with what feels to be at a higher total level.

observations:
-No check engine lights

-Semi difficult to tuck the box up under the engine cover. The closest to the box snap grommet popped up after the drive from tension

- not a big deal but production of the JB+ made it so when I plugged in the box I had to 180 degree twist the opposite side connector to get the orientation of the plugs to line up which used precious slack of the device which made it harder to find a nook to leave it. This is the main cause of the engine cover fitment issue. This also puts twisting tension on the wires which could affect solder joints down the road as heat and Engine vibrations cause wear and tear on the box.

-I will eventually put an intake of the car as well when Dinan list theirs. My guess is the lower restriction air flow to the turbo combined with the over clocking will pay compound dividends in both sound and urgency. Considering the car is really fast enough from stock for this old guy, it is more about experience, personalization, and sounds to me. The low risk and cost of this device with the effect being the exaggerated initial rush to peak torque make it a bullseye for me. I’m happy and will follow up more when I get some more mile on it.
 

RyanA90

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Threads
27
Messages
1,099
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Fairfield, Ca
Website
www.instagram.com
Car(s)
‘23 Supra A91-MT Burnout
So I installed it this morning. The connector was tight and took about 5mins of wiggling with the care and fear that only working in a plastic intensive engine bay can impart. Then like magic it popped off simply as if I hadn’t been doing the same motions previously & frustratingly unsuccessfully before.

I took the car out and slowly warmed it up on my fav river drive in the DC area. Of course freezing rain started to lightly drizzle which is a risky proposition in the Surpa in the best of times. Once up to temp, I was able to open it up on some straights and these are my impressions.

For 230$ bucks, I’m not accustomed to actual performance differences. And the Engine / throttle is absolutely noticeably different. Smooth, powerful and more urgent with the JB+cranked up to the max setting (why not right) as I have a fresh tank of 93 plus octane boost just to be on the safe side. If I had to guess the majority of the gains are at lower RPM as the turbo (from a limited sample) appears to get to peak boost (new peak?) earlier opposed to a more gradual and linear climb in the OEM setup. You really feel the extra push early, by 7000 rpm it feels pretty similar to stock-ish. there may be some over clocking of the turbo with usable extra boost making extra HP ( torque efficiency) up at the very top but it isn’t earth shattering. The difference is the boost shove coming quicker and harder with what feels to be at a higher total level.

observations:
-No check engine lights

-Semi difficult to tuck the box up under the engine cover. The closest to the box snap grommet popped up after the drive from tension

- not a big deal but production of the JB+ made it so when I plugged in the box I had to 180 degree twist the opposite side connector to get the orientation of the plugs to line up which used precious slack of the device which made it harder to find a nook to leave it. This is the main cause of the engine cover fitment issue. This also puts twisting tension on the wires which could affect solder joints down the road as heat and Engine vibrations cause wear and tear on the box.

-I will eventually put an intake of the car as well when Dinan list theirs. My guess is the lower restriction air flow to the turbo combined with the over clocking will pay compound dividends in both sound and urgency. Considering the car is really fast enough from stock for this old guy, it is more about experience, personalization, and sounds to me. The low risk and cost of this device with the effect being the exaggerated initial rush to peak torque make it a bullseye for me. I’m happy and will follow up more when I get some more mile on it.
Nice to know it works for Manuel and for the price/performance it’s win win! I wonder how this will perform with 91 since that’s all I have around me?
 

Crypto79

Banned
Banned
Banned
First Name
John
Joined
Dec 5, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
256
Reaction score
336
Location
Washington DC
Car(s)
2023 Supra A91 MT, 1997 sc300 5 Speed
Nice to know it works for Manuel and for the price/performance it’s win win! I wonder how this will perform with 91 since that’s all I have around me?
more boost equals more chances for detonation so I would recommend a quality octane booster or maybe leaving the JB+ in the default position. But I don’t have any data to support that compared to the Supras tolerances

that said the 6port engines with their lower compression can most likely handle it fine either way since the advertise additional boost of the box is relatively minor. It is the electronic equivalent of putting a smaller diameter supercharger pulley on a car a leaving the stock fuel injectors and ECU to rebalance the mixture. Most likely the worst case is the ecu removing some timing which would be counter productive and defeat the point.

little torque bumps go a long way with the 6speeds lower drive ratios.
 

Deleted member 10795

Guest
So I installed it this morning. The connector was tight and took about 5mins of wiggling with the care and fear that only working in a plastic intensive engine bay can impart. Then like magic it popped off simply as if I hadn’t been doing the same motions previously & frustratingly unsuccessfully before.

I took the car out and slowly warmed it up on my fav river drive in the DC area. Of course freezing rain started to lightly drizzle which is a risky proposition in the Surpa in the best of times. Once up to temp, I was able to open it up on some straights and these are my impressions.

For 230$ bucks, I’m not accustomed to actual performance differences. And the Engine / throttle is absolutely noticeably different. Smooth, powerful and more urgent with the JB+cranked up to the max setting (why not right) as I have a fresh tank of 93 plus octane boost just to be on the safe side. If I had to guess the majority of the gains are at lower RPM as the turbo (from a limited sample) appears to get to peak boost (new peak?) earlier opposed to a more gradual and linear climb in the OEM setup. You really feel the extra push early, by 7000 rpm it feels pretty similar to stock-ish. there may be some over clocking of the turbo with usable extra boost making extra HP ( torque efficiency) up at the very top but it isn’t earth shattering. The difference is the boost shove coming quicker and harder with what feels to be at a higher total level.

observations:
-No check engine lights

-Semi difficult to tuck the box up under the engine cover. The closest to the box snap grommet popped up after the drive from tension

- not a big deal but production of the JB+ made it so when I plugged in the box I had to 180 degree twist the opposite side connector to get the orientation of the plugs to line up which used precious slack of the device which made it harder to find a nook to leave it. This is the main cause of the engine cover fitment issue. This also puts twisting tension on the wires which could affect solder joints down the road as heat and Engine vibrations cause wear and tear on the box.

-I will eventually put an intake of the car as well when Dinan list theirs. My guess is the lower restriction air flow to the turbo combined with the over clocking will pay compound dividends in both sound and urgency. Considering the car is really fast enough from stock for this old guy, it is more about experience, personalization, and sounds to me. The low risk and cost of this device with the effect being the exaggerated initial rush to peak torque make it a bullseye for me. I’m happy and will follow up more when I get some more mile on it.
how did you install it on the MT? Im trying to figure out where I can get through the firewall, how did you do it?
 
OP
OP
Andrew4Supra

Andrew4Supra

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Jan 20, 2021
Threads
100
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
3,551
Location
Powell, Ohio
Car(s)
2021 Supra 3.0 / 2018 Mercedes GLC43 / 2016 VW GTI
- Semi difficult to tuck the box up under the engine cover. The closest to the box snap grommet popped up after the drive from tension

- Not a big deal but production of the JB+ made it so when I plugged in the box I had to 180 degree twist the opposite side connector to get the orientation of the plugs to line up which used precious slack of the device which made it harder to find a nook to leave it. This is the main cause of the engine cover fitment issue. This also puts twisting tension on the wires which could affect solder joints down the road as heat and Engine vibrations cause wear and tear on the box.
~ the clip release was a bit of a process to figure out but I didn’t have any issues with tucking the module under the engine cover. one would never know it was neatly concealed. money well spent and you can indeed feel the performance difference!

C659E04A-4B3C-4E4E-86F0-5532EF15832A.jpeg


E05D28A7-6952-4B9A-9242-3273BB1E51A8.jpeg
 

Roll

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Pittsburgh
Car(s)
2020 Supra
Posting just to let folks know, the clip with the white tab you need to disconnect to plug the new unit in to that everyone generically says is difficult and takes wriggling: after pulling the white tab out SQUEEZE the white tab downwards and it will release very easily.

I used these threads for reference prior to installing and also struggled prior to finding that out - cracked the plastic housing around the wires super easy the second I decided a screwdriver might work.
 

ColonelAdama

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Threads
2
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
1,646
Location
Greenville, SC
Car(s)
2023 Absolute Zero Supra 3.0 Premium MT, 2015 GTI
Posting just to let folks know, the clip with the white tab you need to disconnect to plug the new unit in to that everyone generically says is difficult and takes wriggling: after pulling the white tab out SQUEEZE the white tab downwards and it will release very easily.

I used these threads for reference prior to installing and also struggled prior to finding that out - cracked the plastic housing around the wires super easy the second I decided a screwdriver might work.
Are there any other tricks to it? Definitely squeezed the tab down and spent 20 min trying to get it off with no luck till my fingers couldn't anymore ? Think it would help to have the car warmed up beforehand?


UPDATE: just use an angled pick to lift up the connector from the back while you squeeze the tab and pull. Idk how people do it without a pick but I got it first try with one.


Test drive complete with the dial all the way up. Yes it works fine with the manual. I had a weird power delay in 1st gear once but couldn't recreate it after 10 more tries. Probably ECU still was adapting to the piggy back. No joke this car felt as quick as a G80 M3 I've driven. Gotta be the best bang for the buck mod, period.
 
Last edited:

Eyelise

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Apr 6, 2023
Threads
7
Messages
262
Reaction score
178
Location
NorthEast
Car(s)
2005 Lotus Elise, 2023 Supra
Did everyone buy from burger tuning? Any resellers on the forum?
 
 








Top