razorlab
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bryan
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 8,568
- Reaction score
- 16,797
- Location
- Hudson Valley, NY
- Car(s)
- Not a Corvette.
Yea, I second that the Conti ECF wear like iron. I was 2+ seconds faster at Lime Rock with Nankang CR-S, which is a short 1.5 mile track, but I only get about 4-5 track days with them.I've run the RE-71RS and Continental ECF. They're both what I would consider an Endurance 200 vs a Super 200. The RE warm up quicker, wear quicker and are faster. They seem a bit more tolerant of higher pressures but do get greasy after extended lapping. The ECF wear like iron, warm up a bit slower, a bit more communicative and predictable in my experience. They prefer lower pressures so your starting cold pressure will be lower, hence the extended warm up time. They are not as fast as the RE but they will last at least 50% longer in my estimation, so this is an either/or proposition. I don't have an apples to apples lap comparison but I have driven on both 180 miles to VIR, ran all weekend and drove back home. The ECF show a comically low amount of wear.
These is what my Conti ECF looked like after seven track days:
Sponsored