Syeeee
Well-Known Member
GotchaHe clarified. He meant 'to it's factory limits', and I believe he meant 'limits' as in, 'to the cars ability' on a twisty track.
Sponsored
GotchaHe clarified. He meant 'to it's factory limits', and I believe he meant 'limits' as in, 'to the cars ability' on a twisty track.
yea, pretty good, I'm sure the backpressure is nuts though.I still can't believe that thing has 4 cats on it.
correct. And i may be blunt at times... but also can apologize for my portion of confusion.He clarified. He meant 'to it's factory limits', and I believe he meant 'limits' as in, 'to the cars ability' on a twisty track.
Nah. I'd bet a not insignificant amount of money that a) the manual was already planned well before the Nissan offerings and b) the release had more to do with mid-life sales boost than anything any other company was doing. Where car enthusiasts see a "fight," corporations are just chasing dollars. Don't believe the hype!
M2 CS coming soon. This is the problem with a shared platform. BMW will not give Toyota it's S58 so it can steal it's sales.s58 > b58
I have driven the b58 to its absolute limits and I could use more.
I like the b58, I CAN drive, and I want more. The S58 could provide more.
ICE and a hybrid/electric variant.Nothing new here (as expected). As ive said before, R&D efforts are not in the direction of the evolution of the A90/91 platform. Nissan did do this with the R35 and from conception to current state the R35 did see drastic changes. This will not be the case with the A90/91.
The new platform is where I believe the most efforts are being spent....whatever that new platform is.
LCI then the M2CS-- M2CS is not really super close nor has it been announced at all(test models are out but not confirmed as to what platform variant it might be assume M2 of course). The S58 was never going to be provided to Toyota. Its an M-platform only powerplant.M2 CS coming soon. This is the problem with a shared platform. BMW will not give Toyota it's S58 so it can steal it's sales.
Toyota also said the Supra's fake vents were functional.Fast forward to 10:13. Toyota was "monitoring" the market which to me says they were wanting to see what Nissan did. And yes I agree, manufacturers only care about their profits and shareholders.
should consumers be worried about this new platform? i want to add that the Supra is affordableNothing new here (as expected). As ive said before, R&D efforts are not in the direction of the evolution of the A90/91 platform. Nissan did do this with the R35 and from conception to current state the R35 did see drastic changes. This will not be the case with the A90/91.
The new platform is where I believe the most efforts are being spent....whatever that new platform is.
Let's see it get down a track. We don't race on paper for a reason.
I also didn't say it's not possible, I said it's a pain in the ass.
As you know, a good part of the reason the R35 is still being developed is to recuperate costs.Nothing new here (as expected). As ive said before, R&D efforts are not in the direction of the evolution of the A90/91 platform. Nissan did do this with the R35 and from conception to current state the R35 did see drastic changes. This will not be the case with the A90/91.
The new platform is where I believe the most efforts are being spent....whatever that new platform is.
You proved my point. Earlier I mentioned Toyota counter punched Nissan Z's release with their 6MT Supra release to retain consumer's attention. There are no such things are coincidences in life.Toyota also said the Supra's fake vents were functional.
You proved my point. Earlier I mentioned Toyota counter punched Nissan Z's release with their 6MT Supra release to retain consumer's attention. There are no such things are coincidences in life.