Search results

again, data is fine to have, but does something like this provide any information to the reader? "Well Thought Out Engineering: The design is meticulously crafted, demonstrating a deep understanding of airflow dynamics and thermal efficiency. " Remember what they taught us in middle school...

solid data for point #7, but the rest of your review seems a bit artificial. c'mon man, was it that hard to write a series of bullet points?

the map 6 log isn't really usable. you're feathering the pedal and there's too much closure. do a 3/4 gear pull from 2k to redline. the jb4 isnt activating for half the log because your foot isn't all the way down.

right, my guess is that "map 3" isn't what kills stock turbos. it's people that run it without looking at a single log, creating crazy knock that pulls timing, which then burns up the turbine. the boost level itself is likely fine for the turbo, as long as everything else is fine.

i believe the IBS requires everything to flow through the negative battery cable in order to calculate current. it's not exactly an ammeter, per se, but can detect current from any ground EXCEPT the negative terminal (since you're essentially skipping the little chip there). that being said...

i suppose if you regularly watch your trims and ignition timing, it would help you pre-emptively spot any anomalies after filling up so you can adjust your boost targets. If you don't already do that, then you wouldn't use that information anyway

Seems legit garage in Michigan has a bunch of parts for competitive drifters. Ford 8.8 rear end conversion kits, billet rear suspension arms (non adjustable traction arm for extra durability!), steering angle kits.

stock 2x2.75 rk 3.5 sp1r 3.5 titan 3.5 tomei 3.5 single or 2x3.0 hks 2x2.75 dinan 3.25 made 3.15 akrapovic 2x2.75 injen 3.5 (both single and dual) megan 3.0 single or 2x2.85

I think this might be a special case where the igntion timing was absolute shit and skyrocketed the EGTs. Granted, this was due to more boost than the fuel could handle in the first place... but fixing duty biases would have only minorly helped.

log the entire session, it doesn't take up that much storage on your phone and the app is fine with zooming in and out on it

No not the spliter ramp, though I'm debating on whether I should bite the bullet on that. It can introduce flexibility issues as well as kick you out of a lot of classes that dictate a flat splitter. https://occamsracers.com/2023/12/31/the-dumbest-aero-rules-splitter-rules/ I was referring to...

huh, didn't even notice that their splitter endplates had a tire dam built in

yes, wingless is better than some Street Hunter thing

Yeah basically any of their signature carbon fiber body panels is too big for free shipping. At least you can get free shipping on 5 gas cap covers or 15 key fob holders ?

in the case of the supra, using the rear windshield angle (20 deg) and halving it to estimate the downwash angle is not too far off. obviously, the higher up you go, the closer it'll be to zero. but for most reasonable wing heights, it'll be in the 6-10 degree range. the gtc500 has the right...

does the geomet coating cause any issues with bedding? my guess is that the coating will get swept away from the rotor face upon the first hard stomp, but i'm not sure if it leaves a residue that will gunk up the pad

fenders dont qualify for free shipping, is that intended?

Would be nice if you were able to quickly develop front tire spats that had the proper holes and spacers. Otherwise I will probably piece together my own using the racebred universal kit. https://racebredcomponents.com/products/racebred-components-universal-front-tire-spats

yes, this was posted on the speedindustry YouTube months ago. i tried to reach out directly, but nothing. was hoping other vendors would have some insight.

95% of the time I see these, it's on a car i wouldn't drive, even if it were given to me for free.