Sponsored

Error code 130716 Vanos, exhaust: control error, camshaft is stuck

Z4m40i

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
156
Reaction score
175
Location
Salt Lake City
Car(s)
2020 BMW z4 m40i, 2020 BMW X7 40i
Since I'm currently chasing this issue, I figured I will also share my research. Short story, for most people newly encountering this issue after adding power and/or HPFP, this is tuning related.

To preface, I had a tune finalized w/ stock HPFP and pure850. The stock pump was pushed to its limit, and there were some scenarios where the rail pressure would drop slightly. I added a dorch HPFP after the fact, and did not have a revision. I added this before a track day w/o a revision for a few reasons:

1) Dorch said this was 100% p&p (have to select the bm3 option)
2) I wanted the additional overhead at the track.
3) I'm adding s58 injectors, so I don't want my tuner wasting time with revisions on the old setup.

To my knowledge, there isn't a boost "limit" on these cars, and the DME will use boost as one of the strategies to hit load targets. This is supported from logs on the same tune where it seems both the exhaust vanos and fuel rail pressure hit target 100% during a pull, and other times where fuel rail pressure dropped and/or exhaust vanos deviated from target.

My impression is that there are two scenarios that will cause this error code

1) DME detects one large acute deviation from exhaust vanos actual to target (greater than >40 delta)
2)DME consistently detects a sizeable deviation from exhaust vanos actual to target (around 30 delta)

My tuner said that gen2 b58's are "notorious for exhaust cam walk", and the problem becomes accentuated with aftermarket HPFP's. Dorch didn't confirm this as the issue, but did elude to how stock HPFPs will also have this issue when adding more power. My tuners said that it's common for vanos to fall off target under high boost and/or high RPM, but we can combat this by dropping rail pressure and increase oil pressure. Additionally, he said to reset VANOS and VVT adaptations in bm3.

The nice thing is that for most people, this is a solvable solution via tune. I'm surprised that this doesn't seem to be well documented as this seems like a common side effect from increasing power with a DI system.

From dorch:
"That fault code isn’t necessarily associated with what you are seeing with the vanos mismatch, it really just depends on the conditions of the fault snapshots in ISTA. If it’s happening only at high RPM in the snapshots, then you can be pretty confident that it’s due to your power level/HPFP and it can be tuned for. Otherwise, if it’s random and at startup or cruise, then you’ll want to look into some vanos replacement parts a bit more carefully. To answer your question, yes, a larger HPFP can contribute to this issue when not properly tuned for, but generally speaking these cars have this issue in stock form and it gets worse and worse the more power you make (regardless of HPFP choice). For example, pretty much anything past stock turbos on an S58 car requires a vanos lockout on the exhaust side along with ALL fast drag Supras. It’s not mentioned much, because people seem to think this is some special secret, but the big power guys in B58 and S58 all have locked out exhaust vanos to avoid what you’re seeing. The good news is that at your power level it can be fixed with tuning alone. Let us know if you have any other questions! "
Sponsored

 

razorlab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
8,568
Reaction score
16,798
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Car(s)
Not a Corvette.
Since I'm currently chasing this issue, I figured I will also share my research. Short story, for most people newly encountering this issue after adding power and/or HPFP, this is tuning related.

To preface, I had a tune finalized w/ stock HPFP and pure850. The stock pump was pushed to its limit, and there were some scenarios where the rail pressure would drop slightly. I added a dorch HPFP after the fact, and did not have a revision. I added this before a track day w/o a revision for a few reasons:

1) Dorch said this was 100% p&p (have to select the bm3 option)
2) I wanted the additional overhead at the track.
3) I'm adding s58 injectors, so I don't want my tuner wasting time with revisions on the old setup.

To my knowledge, there isn't a boost "limit" on these cars, and the DME will use boost as one of the strategies to hit load targets. This is supported from logs on the same tune where it seems both the exhaust vanos and fuel rail pressure hit target 100% during a pull, and other times where fuel rail pressure dropped and/or exhaust vanos deviated from target.

My impression is that there are two scenarios that will cause this error code

1) DME detects one large acute deviation from exhaust vanos actual to target (greater than >40 delta)
2)DME consistently detects a sizeable deviation from exhaust vanos actual to target (around 30 delta)

My tuner said that gen2 b58's are "notorious for exhaust cam walk", and the problem becomes accentuated with aftermarket HPFP's. Dorch didn't confirm this as the issue, but did elude to how stock HPFPs will also have this issue when adding more power. My tuners said that it's common for vanos to fall off target under high boost and/or high RPM, but we can combat this by dropping rail pressure and increase oil pressure. Additionally, he said to reset VANOS and VVT adaptations in bm3.

The nice thing is that for most people, this is a solvable solution via tune. I'm surprised that this doesn't seem to be well documented as this seems like a common side effect from increasing power with a DI system.

From dorch:
"That fault code isn’t necessarily associated with what you are seeing with the vanos mismatch, it really just depends on the conditions of the fault snapshots in ISTA. If it’s happening only at high RPM in the snapshots, then you can be pretty confident that it’s due to your power level/HPFP and it can be tuned for. Otherwise, if it’s random and at startup or cruise, then you’ll want to look into some vanos replacement parts a bit more carefully. To answer your question, yes, a larger HPFP can contribute to this issue when not properly tuned for, but generally speaking these cars have this issue in stock form and it gets worse and worse the more power you make (regardless of HPFP choice). For example, pretty much anything past stock turbos on an S58 car requires a vanos lockout on the exhaust side along with ALL fast drag Supras. It’s not mentioned much, because people seem to think this is some special secret, but the big power guys in B58 and S58 all have locked out exhaust vanos to avoid what you’re seeing. The good news is that at your power level it can be fixed with tuning alone. Let us know if you have any other questions! "
Yup, bumping oil pressure 4500 rpm + by just a little worked for me. Even at 29psi boost.

I got it once on track, and right after a shift at high RPM. I run 5w40.
 

Z4m40i

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
156
Reaction score
175
Location
Salt Lake City
Car(s)
2020 BMW z4 m40i, 2020 BMW X7 40i
Yup, bumping oil pressure 4500 rpm + by just a little worked for me. Even at 29psi boost.

I got it once on track, and right after a shift at high RPM. I run 5w40.
Out of curiosity, what lead you to believe that this was an oil pressure tuning issue rather than a mechanical issue?
 

razorlab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
8,568
Reaction score
16,798
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Car(s)
Not a Corvette.
Out of curiosity, what lead you to believe that this was an oil pressure tuning issue rather than a mechanical issue?
Another track guy was having an issue like this and it worked for him.

I also had this happen when I upped the rail pressure with the OEM HPFP, and it also helped with that so I put two and two together. ;)
 

JaredFloyd

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
8
Location
Washington State USA
Car(s)
2020 GR Supra
I've resolved this issue on my setup and believe I found root cause. The latest theory behind the exhaust cam VANOS deviation is that the increased fuel rail pressure adds additional load on the exhaust cam due to the cam-driven high-pressure fuel pump working harder to create that pressure and the additional cam load is too much for the VANOS gear to overcome. One solution is to reduce the target fuel pressure at the rail and use higher flow injectors to maintain sufficient fuel volume. I believe factory fuel rail pressure limit is 35 MPa. Another option is to increase the oil pressure, which provides more force to actuate the VANOS gear. I haven't changed the oil pressure but did drop the rail pressure and add S58 injectors to get back to target fuel. Issue is now solved on track. More details and datalogs here: https://sectoronedesign.wordpress.com/category/supra/
It's basically a battle between the oil pressure driven VANOS cam gear and load placed on the cam from the HPFP. Seems like a high output HPFP is only going to make this issue worse unless the pumps are somehow magically more efficient vs the stock pump and can create higher rail pressure with less load on the cam.
I think many high power tunes bump the rail pressure up at high boost. This may not be intentional by the tuner as it may be driven by unforeseen tables based on load targets.
 

dustwhyn

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dustyn
Joined
Mar 1, 2023
Threads
6
Messages
200
Reaction score
142
Location
‎
Car(s)
2024 M240i xDrive
A shop is quoting me almost 3000 to replace this bolt. Is that crazy?
Not at all. It’s VERY tedious and there’s a potential to fuck everything related to camshaft timing up if you don’t know what you’re doing and take necessary precautions.
 

razorlab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
8,568
Reaction score
16,798
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Car(s)
Not a Corvette.
Not at all. It’s VERY tedious and there’s a potential to fuck everything related to camshaft timing up if you don’t know what you’re doing and take necessary precautions.
$3,000 labor is like 15 hours at $200/hr. That’s like engine in/out time if not more.
 

A90 Dave

Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jul 29, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Location
Australia
Car(s)
A90 Supra
Hi Guys, myself and a mate are having the same issue, on the road the car is perfect but as oil temps rise on track they run into issues. Miss firing high up in the rev range and going into limp. Code
130716 Active VANOS, exhaust: control error, camshaft is stuck, pops up sometimes but not all the time.
It seem to of started after the Dorch HPFP install. I didn’t log vanos on the last track day so don’t have any data. On the street the Vanos actual and target seem fine, but oil temps rises is 30 degrees C on the track over street oil temps. Is there channels I could be logging to check the vanos operation on the street, that may point to the issue? Street log this afternoon attached
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Z4m40i

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
156
Reaction score
175
Location
Salt Lake City
Car(s)
2020 BMW z4 m40i, 2020 BMW X7 40i
It’s almost like we all answered your question and you decided to not take everyone’s advice.

IMG_0217.webp


IMG_0218.webp


IMG_0219.webp
 

razorlab

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bryan
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
8,568
Reaction score
16,798
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Car(s)
Not a Corvette.
Again, very simple fix. Increase the oil pressure. I've done this on over 30 cars at this point.

100% of the time, it works every time.
 

M340Manny

Active Member
First Name
Manny
Joined
Jul 11, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
31
Reaction score
20
Location
BC, Canada
Car(s)
M340i
just another example, Had this same issue with my exhaust cam "walking" in the higher rpm's when i switched to the Dorch DS3. Issue was simply resolved by upping oil pressure. I also use 5w40
 

A90 Dave

Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jul 29, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Location
Australia
Car(s)
A90 Supra
It’s almost like we all answered your question and you decided to not take everyone’s advice.

IMG_0217.webp


IMG_0218.webp


IMG_0219.webp
yes, I asked what it could be, now i’m asking if there is a way to identify a failing vanos actuator/bolt before i go back to the tuner (and potentially dyno) to implement your suggestions. Tuners and dyno in Australia are very expensive. Just want to make sure everything is functioning correctly before that. Sorry
Sponsored

 
 








Top