@ 483whp/565wtq 
. 
Have you done a dyno run on stock turbo on that dyno before?First dyno since turbo install, keep in mind car is factory other than turbo and DP. Stock exhaust as well. Shooting for 500whp, so pretty happy how today turned out
Thanks for the info. I have faith in your team, the project and the product. I'm just eager to see more dataHey Bro! I can send you the log from this dyno run. Let me know the best email.
Keith already ran a 9.6 1/4 mile on stock axles, stock transmission, stock engine and full weight (straight from the dealer). He did this with no 6th gear, you can hear it free spin just shortly after the 1000ft mark but it was still enough to hand the L to “the fastest G80 in Georgia”
@razorlab the problem with waiting for “3rd party results” is that people have lives and providing free results for a vendor is not top on their priority list. If I pay them to get me results, now you’re back to square one aren’t you? Dyno’s can lie but the 1/4 mile doesn’t so watch the pass above for yourself and here is the time slip.
Keith’s car is turned way down from mine. He is currently running 38psi and my car makes 42psi with higher timing and my boost hits immediately while his ramps in due to his stock transmission. I’m very confident that we can get his car to a 9.3 or so with current tune if he had access to the power in 6th. Marin will be turning his second gear up now that we have more data to allow him to leave harder than the 1.4 60’ he cut to see what we can do on stock transmission still before we put in his built transmission.
@AJRMKV the Power as in HP does not drop off, it holds all the way to redline. TQ is what drops off so the statement I made is accurate. As for the HP numbers, the numbers are easily achievable by the Turbo itself, it’s the turbine housing that is holding it back from a higher peak number on this dyno. That said, I could take the car to RPM across town and easily post a 30-50whp higher number on their dynojet. I’ve done this before in the early days of my Genesis Turbo Kit R&D and it’s been repeated by many people over the years. My Genesis Turbo Kit made 371whp at Phantasm and 402whp (31whp or 8.36% higher) at RPM on the same exact tune. Both dynojets and both running the same correction and smoothing. Which number is more accurate? I have no idea, but if I’m going to post anything, I’d rather post the lower number so that more customers will be able to achieve or even exceed it on their local dyno. Whatever the car is actually making, the average HP is extremely high which is why it took down that 1300whp MKIV Supra running 55psi in a roll race. That data was confirmed by the MKIV Supra driver himself to Ali who drove my car during that race. You can see that here:
Oh and btw, I drove my car 9hrs to Montgomery, Alabama from Holly Springs, NC, raced and drove all the way back with once again, no issues. I also managed 31-33mpg hwy on full pump e85 the whole way! I love these cars!!
So now onto a bit more technical information:
We achieved our goal of super fast spool up which is great as we wanted a kit that would dominate on the circuit/road coarse.
That said, we had originally targeted a “0.80 A/R” turbine housing. This was ultimately the wrong way to approach things because A/R is basically a nonsense calculation. Unless you use the same inlet every time, it tells you just about nothing.
For anyone who doesn’t already know, in the case of a turbine housing, A/R is the measure of the Area (2D) of the inlet of the turbine housing divided by the radius of the center point of the inlet to the center shaft of the turbo. If you change the inlet by going from T3 to VBand to T4 to larger VBand to T6, your turbo spool and performance is going to be all over the place even though you keep the A/R as the same number.
So I measured the internal volume of all of my housings to help me find the right size instead of relying on an A/R number. The current 0.80 A/R housing measures in at 16.418 cubic inches in interior volume. When compared to my standard dual VBand turbine housings for the 62, 65 and 70 OMEGA turbos, if you take that volume as a ratio, it’s essentially a 0.63 A/R even though it correctly measures as a 0.80 A/R due to the size of inlet. My standard 0.83 A/R dual VBand turbine housings come in at 21.456 cubic inches which is 30.6% larger than the current housing. If I simply remove the twin scroll from the “turbine housing” section of the current design, it moves it to 20.138 cubic inches which would be enough for at least another 100-150whp peak. We have been testing how well the OMEGA Series turbine wheels flow and they flow well enough that our T4 .82 A/R housing (24.489 cubic inches) has such low backpressure that we could easily flow 1200whp through it.
So obviously, picking the right sizing is a bit tricky. But yes, we will be coming out with a new turbine housing for those folks that need a bit more top end but we are trying to make sure that we do so without sacrificing the incredible spool that we already have. In the meantime, we will be proving what we can do with these setups so stay tuned!
solid + 50 whp and + 90 wtq.First dyno since turbo install, keep in mind car is factory other than turbo and DP. Stock exhaust as well. Shooting for 500whp, so pretty happy how today turned out
Solid gain on pump but i'm sure there's more in it. Your current tune is a pro tune, I wonder what you would have dyno'd pro tune vs ots on stock turbo
Have not, will ask on next upgrade and dyno tune. Question for all: if I want to be in 500whp+ range would my next upgrade be an HPFP? If I wanted to stay on 93?
the car doesn’t trap 140 in the 1/4. It’s much higher than that. He went into 6th gear, free spun it since it has no power holding clutches in stock configuration (only driving clutches), and he coasted the last ~200+feet
ok, i understandthe car doesn’t trap 140 in the 1/4. It’s much higher than that. He went into 6th gear, free spun it since it has no power holding clutches in stock configuration (only driving clutches), and he coasted the last ~200+feet
Keith did a 9.8 @143mph on Map 1, aka the I’ll let my good friend drive my car map, at the same track a few weeks before on old MOTIV firmware. Both cars are way faster on the newest firmware
You can do 500 without a HPFP.
that’s my trap speed, and I run a flat 5, low 5 consistently
You can make 1100 without a HPFP.
What would I need to do next and stay on 93?
