Is it in your manual? If not, I would say no, it is not necessary.
I believe I read that at least some Audi direct injection engines (2.0 turbo) require walnut blasting at 60,000 miles.Auto/tire Shop guy here, just my .02:
if itās a fuel injector cleaner bottle that goes in the gas tank, the above comments are spot on.
If itās an induction cleaning service (cleaner sprayed through intake manifold to clean intake & valves), itās a great idea for direct injected engines. With port fuel injection the intake valves are generally wet so they donāt build up a lot of carbon/deposits, but on DI engines that doesnāt happen due to the injector spraying directly into the combustion chamber, so the deposit build up can slow the air getting into the combustion chamber causing fuel trim issues and performance loss. Without any correction I have seen engines go (more in to 100k-150k mi mark, some as soon as 80k), especially in cheaper cars and when the owners are less prone to thorough maintenance. Thereās a lot of info on this out there if you choose to do your research. I tried to keep the info short and sweet.
You can always contact your dealer or a reputable shop you trust that specializes in these engines for more info.
Correct, my sons 2012 GTI at 120k miles was starting to misfire bad when cold. Had the walnut blasting at the dealer when it was at 70k (from the PO). Me and him did it with the seafoam and zip tie method. I'd buy a walnut blaster if I had to do it again. But it was soooooo badly caked I'm surprised it was running at all.I believe I read that at least some Audi direct injection engines (2.0 turbo) require walnut blasting at 60,000 miles.
If I understand your post and you are referring to carbon build up on the rear face of inlet valves then fuel additives have zero effect because it's a DI engine. For walnut blasting it's a remedial action and has no preventative aspect to it all.By performing these services, this is what prevents that damage, or staves it off anyway. There are plenty of places that recommend them once a year, we just follow oem recommendations where I work, but I can see why others recommend them more frequently.
I donāt think you did, quoted below.If I understand your post and you are referring to carbon build up on the rear face of inlet valves then fuel additives have zero effect because it's a DI engine. For walnut blasting it's a remedial action and has no preventative aspect to it all.
Phil
If itās an induction cleaning service (cleaner sprayed through intake manifold to clean intake & valves), itās a great idea for direct injected engines. With port fuel injection the intake valves are generally wet so they donāt build up a lot of carbon/deposits, but on DI engines that doesnāt happen due to the injector spraying directly into the combustion chamber, so the deposit build up can slow the air getting into the combustion chamber causing fuel trim issues and performance loss. Without any correction I have seen engines go (more in to 100k-150k mi mark, some as soon as 80k), especially in cheaper cars and when the owners are less prone to thorough maintenance. Thereās a lot of info on this out there if you choose to do your research. I tried to keep the info short and sweet.
You can always contact your dealer or a reputable shop you trust that specializes in these engines for more info.
Ok. Makes it easier to follow when people quote what they are responding to.I donāt think you did, quoted below.
Only way to truly prevent build up is water injection. The average Supra owner is not going to do that. Walnut blasting is gonna be their best bet to keep it under control.
I donāt think you read my posts itās all good, I work with a lot of folks that arenāt in the industry and may not have a strong mechanical education. I just try to keep things easy, you are welcome to judge away, if youād like.Weird that a guy that owns an auto shop that makes money doing this BS says this BS is really necessary.
Just a hint, a good amount of people can see your BS a mile away.