NocturnalEmber
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
To state the obvious: this is not a thread inviting direct head to head comparisons between the Supra and the GR:C. I've owned both and can honestly say they do great things, but different great things.
For those of you out there who had to pick just the Supra or the GR:C to daily, which would you pick?
The GR:C was great for me because I could wind it out, and the high strung engine loved it, reminded me of my RX-7's and RX-8's in a way. The downside to the supra is it just doesn't offer as much feedback stock, and you are likely committing a traffic felony if you try.
Downsides for the GR:C? The trunk space was fairly useless. I'd go as far as to say I could carry more items in the Supra if the GR:C had the back seats up, there is very little room in that hatch. Seats down, sure its not bad.
Performance wise? The engine isn't bad. Normally I'm one of those I hate nvh, but the G16E-GTS has an OEM refined level of NVH to it that I quite like. The bad, is that apparently the engine can't really make more power easily. Granted I wouldn't feel the need to chase massive numbers on a car like that, but even to get to 400-450 which I think would be a sweet spot, you need to open the engine and do valve springs, change the turbo, etc.
Perhaps the worst part is the transmission synchros, people are saying the hubs shear off around 350 ft lbs of torque, and its not far from that stock, though aftermarket hubs are available.
I honestly wouldn't mind owning one again, but the issue I keep running into is it'd take quite a bit of work to get where I feel it would be 'complete.'
My biggest complaint is the B58 can seem rather insulated at times, and no android auto. Other than that I don't really have any complaints.
For those of you out there who had to pick just the Supra or the GR:C to daily, which would you pick?
The GR:C was great for me because I could wind it out, and the high strung engine loved it, reminded me of my RX-7's and RX-8's in a way. The downside to the supra is it just doesn't offer as much feedback stock, and you are likely committing a traffic felony if you try.
Downsides for the GR:C? The trunk space was fairly useless. I'd go as far as to say I could carry more items in the Supra if the GR:C had the back seats up, there is very little room in that hatch. Seats down, sure its not bad.
Performance wise? The engine isn't bad. Normally I'm one of those I hate nvh, but the G16E-GTS has an OEM refined level of NVH to it that I quite like. The bad, is that apparently the engine can't really make more power easily. Granted I wouldn't feel the need to chase massive numbers on a car like that, but even to get to 400-450 which I think would be a sweet spot, you need to open the engine and do valve springs, change the turbo, etc.
Perhaps the worst part is the transmission synchros, people are saying the hubs shear off around 350 ft lbs of torque, and its not far from that stock, though aftermarket hubs are available.
I honestly wouldn't mind owning one again, but the issue I keep running into is it'd take quite a bit of work to get where I feel it would be 'complete.'
My biggest complaint is the B58 can seem rather insulated at times, and no android auto. Other than that I don't really have any complaints.
Sponsored