Advertisement

Toyota Supra rumored to be offered with 2.0L turbo 4-cylinder base model

Discussion in 'B48 4-Cyl Engine, Exhaust, Drivetrain, Bolt-Ons' started by 910ps, Feb 8, 2014.

?

Are you going to buy the 4 cylinder version?

  1. Yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. No

    67.9%
  3. Maybe, depends on pricing, transmission offerings, and etc.

    32.1%
  1. justbake

    justbake Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Justin
    Car(s):
    F10 535i
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2018
    Location:
    Indy
    Posts:
    1,250
    Liked:
    2,204
    Were the NA (aka base model) MK3/4s called Celicas?
     
  2. AsupramkvC

    AsupramkvC Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Gerich
    Car(s):
    86
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2018
    Location:
    Philippines, USA, Japan
    Posts:
    366
    Liked:
    372
    Nope. They were all in I6 guise. “I6 = Supra”. Celicas were 4 bangers.
     
    vb22, supraboi, Supra Turbo and 2 others like this.
  3. justbake

    justbake Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Justin
    Car(s):
    F10 535i
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2018
    Location:
    Indy
    Posts:
    1,250
    Liked:
    2,204
    My point is that numbers of cylinders are irrelevant to this conversation since MK3/4s as well as the MK5 each have a 'base' model. The difference here being that BMW no longer has an NA I6
     
  4. zigzagz94

    zigzagz94 Well-Known Member

    Car(s):
    BRZ, 3g Eclipse
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2014
    Location:
    Charon's Ferry
    Posts:
    72
    Liked:
    179
    They could easily do a $60K I6 Supra, a $40K 4cyl Celica (basically a base supra with different front and rear panels like the old days MKI and MKII) and then a $25-$30K hot hatch.
     
    Supra Turbo, Captain_Kirk and Bryster like this.
  5. AsupramkvC

    AsupramkvC Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Gerich
    Car(s):
    86
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2018
    Location:
    Philippines, USA, Japan
    Posts:
    366
    Liked:
    372
    #230 Jan 8, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
    I get your point. I would prefer it this way: Toyota would use BMW’s turbo I6 with lower power output for the base trim, and a more powerful version for the upper trim level/s.

    Just like the Porsche 911(991.2 onwards) nowadays. Carrera and Carrera S share the same engine, while the latter being the more powerful version.

    Besides, Toyota collaborated with BMW because of the I6, which is the heart & soul of Supra.
     
  6. Bosstee

    Bosstee Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Bastian
    Car(s):
    A90 Supra
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2018
    Location:
    Germany
    Posts:
    116
    Liked:
    164
    Going that route would be an option, but it wouldn't put a large enough dent in the price point (4 cyl is rumored to be 1/3 less in line with Z4 pricing.) The 991.2 is in a different price league and doesn't have a comparable sibling. So in their case a 15%-20% price difference is possible.
     
  7. AsupramkvC

    AsupramkvC Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Gerich
    Car(s):
    86
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2018
    Location:
    Philippines, USA, Japan
    Posts:
    366
    Liked:
    372
    1/3 less is compared with the I6 or I4?:hmm:
     
  8. Bosstee

    Bosstee Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Bastian
    Car(s):
    A90 Supra
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2018
    Location:
    Germany
    Posts:
    116
    Liked:
    164
    60k-40k = 20k -> 20k/60k -> 1/3 less
     
    SPMS likes this.
  9. AsupramkvC

    AsupramkvC Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Gerich
    Car(s):
    86
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2018
    Location:
    Philippines, USA, Japan
    Posts:
    366
    Liked:
    372
    #234 Jan 9, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2019
    If this will turn out to be true, then it would sound like Toyota wants to sell more I4 than I6 Supra. Isn’t it? o_O

    But initially, only the I6 will be sold. It would take quite some time before they release the 4-cylinder version.

    If only Toyota partnered with BMW for the I4, then I’d go I4. One way I’d go I4 is if it’s really good(somewhat, somehow as good as the I6). Have to wait and read reviews. Can’t wait for January 14! Only a few more days to go!
     
  10. AsupramkvC

    AsupramkvC Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Gerich
    Car(s):
    86
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2018
    Location:
    Philippines, USA, Japan
    Posts:
    366
    Liked:
    372
    #235 Jan 9, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2019
  11. SupraFiend

    SupraFiend Well-Known Member

    Car(s):
    5 Supras currently
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2017
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Posts:
    574
    Liked:
    837
    No, the logical natural progression, considering that what they are finally delivering to us is a car with essentially the exact same size, wheel base and suspension design as the 86, would have been to do a 2nd gen of the 86 with Subaru and give us an 86 variant and a Supra variant off the same platform, and stick their new TT V6 in it for the Supra. That would have been the logical, quickest and most economical thing to do, not to mention keep all the Toyota purists happy. Despite what Toyota claims about these Supra purists they supposedly talked to, the general consensus on this forum from people who have actually owned Toyotas before is that they would have preferred a turbo Toyota V6 under the hood to a BMW inline 6. Instead they partnered with their own luxery brand's biggest nemesis, took 7 long painful years of development, and are giving us a 100% BMW that is a step back from the car its succeeding in most ways, and its going to cost at least 20% more then it should.

    /bitter rant.

    But hey, at least we are getting a new Supra lol.
     
  12. Rotaryrunner

    Rotaryrunner Well-Known Member

    Car(s):
    Mazda RX 8
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2017
    Location:
    Germany
    Posts:
    347
    Liked:
    739
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    Hey, could be worse.

    The Mitsubishi eclipse fanboys got a god damn SUV ( Stupid useless vehicle )

    Ladies and gentlemen! This is the new Supra. It's got a 2.5L diesel engine 7 seats, AWD and can drive through 70 millimetres deep lakes
     
    Bryster, vb22, Jabba and 5 others like this.
  13. zigzagz94

    zigzagz94 Well-Known Member

    Car(s):
    BRZ, 3g Eclipse
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2014
    Location:
    Charon's Ferry
    Posts:
    72
    Liked:
    179
    @SupraFiend, I totally understand your rant and get where you're coming from.

    All I'm saying is that there's no information from any of our reliable insiders that a second gen 86 is being worked on. If it's going to be a 2020-2021 car then development should be well underway.

    It would be a lot more cost effective to swap a few body panels on a 4cyl "Supra", crash test it, and release it as a Celica as opposed to doing a second generation of the 86.
     
  14. SupraFiend

    SupraFiend Well-Known Member

    Car(s):
    5 Supras currently
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2017
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Posts:
    574
    Liked:
    837
    Sure, if it was made in Japan or Asia. But I don't think there is anyway to get that BMW platform down less then $35k with any engine under the hood. Maybe if they shipped it without an interior lol.
     
    A70TTR likes this.
  15. zigzagz94

    zigzagz94 Well-Known Member

    Car(s):
    BRZ, 3g Eclipse
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2014
    Location:
    Charon's Ferry
    Posts:
    72
    Liked:
    179
    #240 Jan 10, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019
    Oh no the Celica would definitely be in the $40 K range. The yaris hot hatch would have to slot into that sub $35K price bracket. Performance Pack and special edition 86/BRZ are already low to mid 30K so 40K for a factory turbo with 65-80 more HP doesn't seem like too much of a stretch for current owners.

     

Share This Page

Loading...