Dannyvandelft
Well-Known Member
Yeah all that, and then consider the track is ONLY a minute long. Now go drive a proper 2+ minute track. The difference to the 2.0 will be 5 seconds plus, and 10 seconds plus for the 86. That's huge! Now go to the Nordschleife where the 3.0 does an 8 minute lap. The 2.0 will be roughly 40 seconds or more slower. See where I'm getting at? It's relative to the time on track.The laptimes on this are actually interesting.
Supra 2021 3.0: 1:03:43
Supra 2.0: 1:05:35 -----------> 1.92s slower than 3.0
86 TRD: 1:08:51---------------> 3.16s slower than 2.0, 5.0s slower than 3.0
Yes, the track is short and technical, big power does not dominate, the handling and balance are more important. So despite having around 180-200hp less at the crank (since 21' dyno around 382 at the wheels which gives around 450hp at the crank), not having adaptive suspension (so no stiffer setting for the track), having no e-diff and smaller non-Brembo brakes the gap is not even 2seconds. Just changing the tires to sth like M CUP2 will give a time withing tenths of 3.0 upgreaded model, ofc on a small technical track. Yea, of coourse we can put them on 3.0 and the gap will again be wider, but just a thought how to narrow it in a simple way.
Yes, on small track is not "small" difference, and higher speed track would wider it further, but I think the 2.0 did really well actually having much less power and less "features".. The 86 TRD got upgreaded Sachs dampers with springs, Brembo brakes and Pilot Sport 4 tires and yet the gap is almost 3.2s compared to 2.0 but that is actually quite big already. And in my opinion 86 esp with TRD handling goodies is better balanced and sharper than Supra.
I expected 2.0 to be at least 3s slower, and its not. Its almost as fast as Bullit Mustang and the power difference is also huge there.
I'm kinda impressed, with a bit of suspension tuning and some power mods the 2.0 with its ligher weight seems quite promising.
Sponsored