Without a baseline to compare, this is really just a graph. I would say that they look a little lower than what I would expect with those mods but again, there’s no baseline to compare to so the numbers could be fine.I forgot to get a baseline on the car, big mistake, but I'm going to do an OTS just 93 map to compare to this custom tune. It seems low mods are (Highflow catted DP, modx catback, 93 octane, and meth-boost juice with snow kit. Tuned on BM3.
![]()
That's why I'm kicking myself for not getting a baseline, just slipped my mind. TQ seems really low all the way through.Without a baseline to compare, this is really just a graph. I would say that they look a little lower than what I would expect with those mods but again, there’s no baseline to compare to so the numbers could be fine.
You live and you learn.That's why I'm kicking myself for not getting a baseline, just slipped my mind. TQ seems really low all the way through.
517wtq is low? :-/That's why I'm kicking myself for not getting a baseline, just slipped my mind. TQ seems really low all the way through.
You mean thick line right? The thin line is what you posted in post #1Here is the bm3 OTS vs the custom map (thin line is OTS)![]()
So the graph in post #1 is OTS? It shows 517wtq, which is the thin line in post #7.No the thin line is the meth map. The OTS makes more TQ at 3k rpm with 0 meth
What are you expecting it should make?Sorry typo the first map is a custom meth map and the comparison is the thin line which it makes a little more in the middle but I would expect more.
go catlessI was thinking I should be at least in the 500+whp& 525/600tq range, but maybe I'm wrong. That's why I was looking for advice on this. I just wouldn't have spent $1200 in tuning for tweaked ots maps.