Melchior
Member
I've had an E90 and (2) E92's over the years. The E92 M3 is such a fun chassis and car on track and autocross. It never gets high praise from anyone because it needs a little to make it that entertaining on track. But, once you spend a little money preping the car it is such a capable platorm and rewarding to drive.an E9X M3 is not track ready, if you want something as track ready as a supra, be prepared to spend at least 5-6k just to get it to the Supra's level. The Supra is too soft for the track, so it needs upgrades as well, but not nearly as much as the E9X M3.
I've had one 6-7 years ago (2013 E92 ZCP), sold it for a Cayman S after 6 months. That car needs A LOT of money to make it a good track car.
Pros for the E92, the hydraulic steering feel is amazing and one of the biggest things I miss about the E92 M3. The NA powerband, linear torque curve, high reving V8 was an actual experience to drive. At 8800 RPM the S65 sounds phenomenal. The DCT is also much more rewarding to drive. The ZF8 is the best auto transmission I've driven, but the DCT was lightning fast with up shifts and downshift in comparison. It felt like the equivalent of automated manual transmission, where you had complete control over it. That's just not possible with a torque converter, unfortunately. The chassis is very playful on track but I was coming from one with a well setup suspension. It was very easy to drive at the limit and slightly over drive above the limit. Part of this has to do with the hydraulic steering feel, but the rear suspension and diff on the E92 did what ever you asked it. Maybe it's because of the soft Supra OEM suspension and front limited OEM springs, and turbo torque spike, but I don't feel anywhere nearly as connected to the rear end of the Supra on track or autocross.
Pros for the Supra, the interior is centuries ahead of the E92, so it's an enjoyable place to be. The weight starts off almost as low as I got my E92 M3 down to and it has a more tossable feel to it. The engine makes up for it's lack of soul by having a ton of torque and is straight line as fast as my E92 M3 was (until it became supercharged in it's later life!). The water and oil cooling from the factory can handle factory power levels decently on track (not nearly as terrible as the the lack of OEM cooling in the E92 M3), however, the charge air cooler is still substantially undersized from the start and will pull power on track after a lap or two (I'm at 5280 ft elevation). The brakes are more capable OEM with pads (I also just ran pads on my E92 but they never felt as confident as I wanted), but neither car has as much brake as they really should from the factory. The Supra has a near flat underbody, the E92 wasn't terrible but wasn't nearly as clean. The oil cooler is no longer laying flat and directing air under the car making a splitter more robust and better potential aero performance. The Supra also feels much smaller.
The biggest upside to the Supra is the potential is huge! I'm already ~1.5 seconds off my old NA non-aero E92 M3 at my local track (perfect conditions right after a fast repave, but that was 6 years ago with older 200tw technology) and ~ 3 seconds off my fastest aero E92 M3 lap (more recently with perfect conditions and more recent 200tw technology). Tons of potential from there.
Sponsored
Last edited: