2020 Supra vs 2021 Supra Dyno Results

Status
Not open for further replies.

65sohc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Mar 8, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
466
Reaction score
272
Location
Fresno, CA
Car(s)
65 GTO, 69 Corvette, 65 Corvette 427, 23 Corvette
The video in fact reinforces what I said. Despite being somewhat verbose, Richard Holdener knows what he's talking about. If you listen from 9:40 on you'll see he is saying exactly what I said.
Sponsored

 

Frosty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
51
Reaction score
20
Location
IL
Car(s)
2020 Toyota Supra, 2016 Ford F150, 1993 Ford Mustang GT
LOL okay. Transmissions become more efficient the more power you throw at them or is it the fact youā€™re throwing more power at it and the losses are less obvious?
 

65sohc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Mar 8, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
466
Reaction score
272
Location
Fresno, CA
Car(s)
65 GTO, 69 Corvette, 65 Corvette 427, 23 Corvette
A Powerglide takes 20 hp (Let's say, but I think that is pretty close). A mechanical water pump takes 5 hp to spin. A power steering pump takes maybe 5 hp. An alternator 5 hp. All hypothetical but close to reality. The effect is additive, ie. 20+5+5+5=35. They have a fixed amount of drag. If an engine makes 300 hp@6000 RPM it takes 35 hp to spin these accessories. If you add 15 lbs of boost and are suddenly making 600 hp at the same 6000 RPM the accessories are spinning at the same speed. Therefore they are creating the same amount of drag, ie. 35 hp. 35hp is a much lower percentage of 600 than it is of 300. The point I am making is that extrapolating from rear wheel horsepower to flywheel horsepower is not a simple calculation based on a fixed percentage. As the horsepower increases the percentage decreases.
 

kona61

Well-Known Member
First Name
Josh
Joined
Mar 25, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
1,029
Reaction score
1,409
Location
San Bernardino-ish, CA
Car(s)
Sold Launch Edition Supra #445
Vehicle Showcase
1
A Powerglide takes 20 hp (Let's say, but I think that is pretty close). A mechanical water pump takes 5 hp to spin. A power steering pump takes maybe 5 hp. An alternator 5 hp. All hypothetical but close to reality. The effect is additive, ie. 20+5+5+5=35. They have a fixed amount of drag. If an engine makes 300 hp@6000 RPM it takes 35 hp to spin these accessories. If you add 15 lbs of boost and are suddenly making 600 hp at the same 6000 RPM the accessories are spinning at the same speed. Therefore they are creating the same amount of drag, ie. 35 hp. 35hp is a much lower percentage of 600 than it is of 300. The point I am making is that extrapolating from rear wheel horsepower to flywheel horsepower is not a simple calculation based on a fixed percentage. As the horsepower increases the percentage decreases.
Iā€™m no engineer, but I think the transmission does vary on parasitic losses depending on how much power you put through it. I agree that pumps and whatnot likely have no change, and most modern cars disconnect the ancillaries under load anyways.
 

HaiFrends

Well-Known Member
First Name
Phil
Joined
Feb 28, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
113
Reaction score
47
Location
Brevard County
Car(s)
2020 3.0 GR Supra Nocturnal Black
A Powerglide takes 20 hp (Let's say, but I think that is pretty close). A mechanical water pump takes 5 hp to spin. A power steering pump takes maybe 5 hp. An alternator 5 hp. All hypothetical but close to reality. The effect is additive, ie. 20+5+5+5=35. They have a fixed amount of drag. If an engine makes 300 hp@6000 RPM it takes 35 hp to spin these accessories. If you add 15 lbs of boost and are suddenly making 600 hp at the same 6000 RPM the accessories are spinning at the same speed. Therefore they are creating the same amount of drag, ie. 35 hp. 35hp is a much lower percentage of 600 than it is of 300. The point I am making is that extrapolating from rear wheel horsepower to flywheel horsepower is not a simple calculation based on a fixed percentage. As the horsepower increases the percentage decreases.
Pretty interesting. Might be difficult but wonder if we could hone in on a generalized "sliding scale" power loss on higher power gains (if that makes sense)
 

Supra Werty

Well-Known Member
First Name
Will
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
91
Reaction score
53
Location
Arizona
Car(s)
2021 supra
I have a feeling the whole gain is from a couple extra pounds of boost. That is just my assumption based on the lower compression and slightly better exhaust manifold for better higher rpm power. I still believe the ā€˜20 engine will feel a tad more responsive due to the higher compression. Nothing earth shattering but possibly even more noticeable during cruising.
It's not just the manifold, the cylinder head changed.
 

Frosty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
51
Reaction score
20
Location
IL
Car(s)
2020 Toyota Supra, 2016 Ford F150, 1993 Ford Mustang GT
It's not just the manifold, the cylinder head changed.
I know the exhaust manifold is integrated into the cylinder head. With that said, do you know it there are any additional changes in the valve train? Cams? Port size?
 

Supra Werty

Well-Known Member
First Name
Will
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
91
Reaction score
53
Location
Arizona
Car(s)
2021 supra
I know the exhaust manifold is integrated into the cylinder head. With that said, do you know it there are any additional changes in the valve train? Cams? Port size?
I don't know
 

MA617M

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2017
Threads
23
Messages
2,302
Reaction score
5,150
Location
Australia
Car(s)
lots
Iā€™m no engineer, but I think the transmission does vary on parasitic losses depending on how much power you put through it. I agree that pumps and whatnot likely have no change, and most modern cars disconnect the ancillaries under load anyways.
You are correct

The gear speed will affect torque, not to mention heat load. This all effects the losses from engine to wheels. Yes, it becomes less dramatic, but it's a function of power, not an offset.
 

Supbrah

Well-Known Member
First Name
DB
Joined
Apr 13, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
131
Reaction score
139
Location
USA
Car(s)
2020 Downshift Blue Supra
Iā€™ve been reading around on OpenFlash. Itā€™s very cool that they are working on this platform.

Canā€™t wait to see what they announce!
 

65sohc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Mar 8, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
466
Reaction score
272
Location
Fresno, CA
Car(s)
65 GTO, 69 Corvette, 65 Corvette 427, 23 Corvette
You are correct

The gear speed will affect torque, not to mention heat load. This all effects the losses from engine to wheels. Yes, it becomes less dramatic, but it's a function of power, not an offset.
As Holdener said, as you apply more torque to the drivetrain there is a nominal increase in heat generated through friction but the increase in drag is as measured on the dyno would be tiny.
 
OP
OP
OpenFlash Performance

OpenFlash Performance

Active Member
First Name
Shiv
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
30
Reaction score
67
Location
SF Bay
Car(s)
Supra, 458, FF, GT3, CX9
I recall having this discussion with Richard 15yrs ago at Thunderhill Raceway during a USTCC race. I argued that drivetrain losses are *mostly* fixed. But there is also a loss component that is depending on power output. A car that pulls more power to the rollers will generate more heat (frictional loss) and tire carcass distortion than a car will less power. Even though they may both be tested in the same gear with the same min and max roller speed. It's an interesting discussion but every car will be a little different due to variance in transmission design/metalurgy/tire selection/oil viscosity/etc,. But basically, it's best to only talk about wheel hp measured on the same dyno since wheel-to-crank corrections are always going to be estimates/guesses.
 

65sohc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Mar 8, 2020
Threads
11
Messages
466
Reaction score
272
Location
Fresno, CA
Car(s)
65 GTO, 69 Corvette, 65 Corvette 427, 23 Corvette
On a related note, how much fuel do you suppose a Supra consumes during two dyno runs? I am planning to dyno my car stock on 91 and then upload my e50 tune and add enough e85 to achieve e50.
 

Marin@MarinTuned

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
214
Reaction score
238
Location
Scottsdale AZ
Car(s)
2020 GR Supra
On a related note, how much fuel do you suppose a Supra consumes during two dyno runs? I am planning to dyno my car stock on 91 and then upload my e50 tune and add enough e85 to achieve e50.
This can vary on a lot of factors. Simply show up on pump gas with a half tank. Let the car sit for a few minutes and then check with logging the estimated fuel remaining and blend your fuel. Do a few partial throttle pulls to flush the fuel system out. I have no issues doing this on the regular.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 




Top