Will track the car normally again end of August. But guess it will be hard to tell compared to OEM (not pushing the car to its limits).If You can, share impressions after track and especially if body roll is reduced with springs
No real update on this. They took it for a couple of blocks, but did not really test if it helped in body roll.If You can, share impressions after track and especially if body roll is reduced with springs
Thats even better coz I wanted to do stiffer springs + bigger front sway for roll reduce instead changing whole suspension.No real update on this. They took it for a couple of blocks, but did not really test if it helped in body roll.
But in the meantime... also ordered the Cusco swaybars for front and back.
Well I am curious as well regarding those anti-roll bars.Thats even better coz I wanted to do stiffer springs + bigger front sway for roll reduce instead changing whole suspension.
Looking forward even more then
No not to the wheels and on 93 octane (98 ron)Is the 540-550hp to the wheels?
Yeah I get youNo not to the wheels and on 93 octane (98 ron)
Here in Europe we are in 99.99% of the cases never advertising HP to the wheels.
But if not mistaken, it is 13% taken into account as drivetrain loss.
I don't have the graphs yet as they are still tweaking the baseline: need to further tune the lower RPM range before turning up the boost.
Something to do with a reference point that apparently the ECU takes into account. Compared to the stock turbo, we are missing HP & torque in the lower range. First thing first, having a very good baseline over the entire RPM range.
Great numbers especially for 93 MON (98 RON) pump gas.
Can't wait to see what it will put down once the ECUTEK mapping parameters are all figured out.
Nice to know that the 2nd iteration of the modified turbo is doing great.
All the best and stay safe.